• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Advanced Placement Performance
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

Related Links:

•  MCAS Results

Did You Know:

• MCAS results are used for
  • Improvements in teaching and learning
  • School and district accountability
  • Student accountability

MCAS Annual Comparisons Data Last Updated on September 26, 2016 More about the data

---

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 16 10 27 PROFICIENT 58 48 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 30 23 FAILING 9 12 10

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 12 8 19 PROFICIENT 30 21 24 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 30 28 FAILING 32 41 29

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 3 1 6 PROFICIENT 38 24 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 44 49 35 FAILING 15 25 18

 

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 5 11 10 PROFICIENT 76 73 75 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 12 11 WARNING 3 5 4

GRADE 08 - HISTORY ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1999 2000 ADVANCED 3 1 PROFICIENT 18 14 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 47 55 WARNING 32 30

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 9 13 13 PROFICIENT 38 31 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 38 27 WARNING 23 17 25

 

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 3 13 8 PROFICIENT 39 41 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 42 28 29 WARNING 16 18 17

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 0 2 1 PROFICIENT 22 24 21 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 76 67 69 WARNING 2 7 8

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 6 9 8 PROFICIENT 21 25 29 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 52 54 47 WARNING 21 11 16

 

GRADE 04 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 1998 1999 2000 ADVANCED 6 11 8 PROFICIENT 53 52 57 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 35 32 WARNING 3 2 3