Massachusetts School and District Profiles

David Prouty High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - David Prouty High

Organization Information
District:Spencer-E Brookfield (07670000)School type:High School
School:David Prouty High (07670505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 98.9, Target = 95.3CPI = 98.9, Target = 95.3CPI = 98.9, Target = 95.3 92.0 97.0 98.9 1.9 95.3 96.0 6666100Above Target
High needsCPI = 96.6, Target = 88.7CPI = 96.6, Target = 88.7CPI = 96.6, Target = 88.7 80.6 91.7 96.6 4.9 88.7 90.3 6722100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 98.6, Target = 95.7CPI = 98.6, Target = 95.7CPI = 98.6, Target = 95.7 92.6 98.6 98.6 0.0 95.7 96.3 4855100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.8, Target = 92.6CPI = 88.8, Target = 92.6CPI = 88.8, Target = 92.6 87.3 89.4 88.8 -0.6 92.6 93.7 346525No Change
High needsCPI = 80.7, Target = 82.2CPI = 80.7, Target = 82.2CPI = 80.7, Target = 82.2 69.4 80.9 80.7 -0.2 82.2 84.7 412225No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.9, Target = 92.7CPI = 88.9, Target = 92.7CPI = 88.9, Target = 92.7 87.4 91.4 88.9 -2.5 92.7 93.7 175425No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.4, Target = 93CPI = 90.4, Target = 93CPI = 90.4, Target = 93 88.0 89.1 90.4 1.3 93.0 94.0 406550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 90.9, Target = 86.5CPI = 90.9, Target = 86.5CPI = 90.9, Target = 86.5 76.8 82.8 90.9 8.1 86.5 88.4 8722100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.8, Target = 92.5CPI = 89.8, Target = 92.5CPI = 89.8, Target = 92.5 87.2 90.7 89.8 -0.9 92.5 93.6 205425No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 41.1 15.2660 1.9 0.06625
High needs 38.9 4.5220 5.6 0.02225
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 45.7 18.2550 0.0 0.05525
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 43.1 38.5650 3.7 3.16525
High needs 28.9 18.2220 10.5 9.12225
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 48.4 38.9540 2.2 3.7540
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 14.6 18.56525 1.0 0.06525
High needs 3.1 9.12225 3.1 0.02225
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 16.5 20.45425 0.0 0.05425
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51 35.0 30.0 -5.0 51.0Yes5075On Target
High needs --- 51.0-13--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-10--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-3--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51 34.0 29.0 -5.0 51.0No410Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 49.0 51.0 2.0 51.0No4975On Target
High needs --- 51.0-13--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-10--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-3--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 47.0 40.0 -7.0 51.0No4025Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 84.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 84.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 84.7, Target = 80 84.4 84.7 0.3 80.0 90.011175On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 74.6, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 74.6, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 74.6, Target = 80 69.5 74.6 5.1 80.0 90.06350Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.013--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.01--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.06--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.04--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 85.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 85.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 85.9, Target = 80 84.7 85.9 1.2 80.0 90.09975On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 86.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 86.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 86.1, Target = 85 88.7 86.1 -2.6 85.0 95.012275On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 72.9, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 72.9, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 72.9, Target = 85 81.4 72.9 -8.5 85.0 95.0590Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.028--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.01--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.07--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.02--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 85.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 85.6, Target = 85 87.6 85.6 -2.0 85.0 95.011175On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 2.6, Target = 2.9 5.0 3.4 2.6 0.8 2.9 2.52541775On Target
High needsDropout Rate = 5.5, Target = 3.8 6.5 5.2 5.5 -0.3 3.8 3.31814625No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------98--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------58--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------34--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 2.5, Target = 2.5 4.3 3.4 2.5 0.9 2.5 2.21735675On Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students6868100Yes686799Yes6868100Yes
High needs2424100Yes2424100Yes2424100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged17---17---17---
EL and Former EL1---1---1---
Students w/ disabilities8---8---8---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2---2---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2---2---
Hispanic/Latino7---7---7---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White5555100Yes555498Yes5555100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles