Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Claypit Hill School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Claypit Hill School
Organization Information
District:Wayland (03150000)School type:Elementary School
School:Claypit Hill School (03150005)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.1, Target = 96.4CPI = 92.1, Target = 96.4CPI = 92.1, Target = 96.4 93.9 92.6 92.1 -0.5 96.4 97.0 7927925No Change
High needsCPI = 77.4, Target = 89CPI = 77.4, Target = 89CPI = 77.4, Target = 89 81.1 75.0 77.4 2.4 89.0 90.6 597250Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75.4, Target = 88.2CPI = 75.4, Target = 88.2CPI = 75.4, Target = 88.2 79.7 71.3 75.4 4.1 88.2 89.9 785850Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 91, Target = 95.7CPI = 91, Target = 95.7CPI = 91, Target = 95.7 92.7 93.8 91.0 -2.8 95.7 96.4 38250Declined
Afr. Amer./Black -------20--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.7, Target = 97CPI = 92.7, Target = 97CPI = 92.7, Target = 97 94.8 94.1 92.7 -1.4 97.0 97.4 7721375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.7, Target = 94.1CPI = 93.7, Target = 94.1 89.8 93.4 93.7 0.3 94.1 94.9 8828375On Target
High needsCPI = 79.9, Target = 82.7CPI = 79.9, Target = 82.7CPI = 79.9, Target = 82.7 70.4 79.9 79.9 0.0 82.7 85.2 687625No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------21--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 79, Target = 82.7CPI = 79, Target = 82.7CPI = 79, Target = 82.7 70.3 77.6 79.0 1.4 82.7 85.2 866250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 97, Target = 95.7CPI = 97, Target = 95.7CPI = 97, Target = 95.7 92.7 96.5 97.0 0.5 95.7 96.4 6425100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------22--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.4, Target = 94.5CPI = 94.4, Target = 94.5 90.6 94.5 94.4 -0.1 94.5 95.3 88215100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94, Target = 96.4CPI = 94, Target = 96.4CPI = 94, Target = 96.4 93.9 93.8 94.0 0.2 96.4 97.0 9591100Above Target
High needsCPI = 77.5, Target = 89.1CPI = 77.5, Target = 89.1CPI = 77.5, Target = 89.1 81.3- 77.5 -5.6 89.1 90.7 82200Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------7--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.6, Target = 96.2CPI = 96.6, Target = 96.2 93.4 93.4 96.6 3.2 96.2 96.7 9773100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 21.6 20.82790 2.2 2.22790
High needs 0.0 8.37225 10.0 8.37225
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 8.65825 12.8 10.35825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 41.7 24.0250 5.6 4.02525
Afr. Amer./Black--20---20-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--16---16-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.1 21.12130 1.0 1.92130
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 52.2 52.32830 2.6 2.128325
High needs 16.4 17.1760 8.2 7.9760
Econ. Disadvantaged--21---21-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 10.4 17.76225 10.4 9.7620
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 83.3 52.0250 2.8 4.0250
Afr. Amer./Black--22---22-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--16---16-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 52.2 56.32150 2.4 1.921525
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 51.0 47.3910 0.0 0.09125
High needs 26.5 10.0200 5.9 0.02025
Econ. Disadvantaged--7---7-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 51.3 52.1730 0.0 0.07325
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 55.0 55.0 0.0 51.0No17775On Target
High needsSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 41.0 43.0 2.0 51.0No3950Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-10--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 50.5 43.0 -7.5 51.0No3350Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-15--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-12--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51 55.0 55.5 0.5 51.0No13675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 63.0 55.0 -8.0 51.0No18175On Target
High needsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 58.0 44.0 -14.0 51.0No4350Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-12--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 62.5 44.0 -18.5 51.0Yes3775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-15--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-14--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51 62.0 54.5 -7.5 51.0No13875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.05-
High needs- 60.05-
EL and Former EL- 60.05-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students28628299Yes286286100Yes9191100Yes
High needs777395Yes7777100Yes2020100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged21---21---7---
EL and Former EL5---5---2---
Students w/ disabilities635995Yes6363100Yes15---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2727100Yes2727100Yes3---
Afr. Amer./Black22---22---6---
Hispanic/Latino5---5---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.16---16---6---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White21621499Yes216216100Yes7373100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles