Massachusetts School and District Profiles

William A Welch Sr

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - William A Welch Sr

Organization Information

District:

Peabody (02290000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

William A Welch Sr (02290027)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Northeast

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		81.5	80.4	81.1	0.7	89.2	90.8	30	127	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		79.8	77.7	79.2	1.5	88.2	89.9	67	107	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		81.0	81.0	81.8	0.8	82.6	90.5	74	84	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		77.0	74.6	76.8	2.2	86.6	88.5	72	57	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		72.6	73.1	67.9	-5.2	84.0	86.3	60	28	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		81.1	77.5	79.6	2.1	89.0	90.6	79	49	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		83.6	82.0	83.2	1.2	90.4	91.8	23	61	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		77.4	73.9	69.5	-4.4	86.8	88.7	8	127	0	Declined
High needs		75.5	71.2	68.9	-2.3	85.7	87.8	23	107	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		70.2	70.2	67.6	-2.6	72.7	85.1	18	84	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		75.5	67.7	69.7	2.0	85.7	87.8	37	57	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		66.1	61.1	59.8	-1.3	80.2	83.1	35	28	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		76.2	68.9	70.4	1.5	86.1	88.1	38	49	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		80.6	76.2	70.1	-6.1	88.7	90.3	4	61	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		83.2	85.6	78.5	-7.1	90.2	91.6	42	50	0	Declined
High needs		81.9	82.1	76.9	-5.2	89.4	91.0	80	39	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		82.8	82.8	77.3	-5.5	84.2	91.4	87	33	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		76.1	-	-	-	-	88.1	-	21	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		68.8	-	-	-	-	84.4	-	21	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		86.5	-	-	-	-	93.3	-	23	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	5.0	8.7	127	25	5.0	6.3	127	0
High needs	2.7	4.7	107	25	5.4	7.5	107	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.6	6.0	84	25	4.8	6.0	84	0
EL and Former EL	1.6	3.5	57	25	6.3	7.0	57	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	28	0	0.0	17.9	28	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Hispanic/Latino	3.3	8.2	49	25	4.9	8.2	49	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	6.3	8.2	61	25	6.3	3.3	61	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	10.0	7.9	127	0	16.4	15.7	127	0
High needs	7.1	4.7	107	0	19.5	16.8	107	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.1	3.6	84	0	22.6	17.9	84	25
EL and Former EL	4.6	5.3	57	25	23.1	12.3	57	25
Students w/ disabilities	3.7	7.1	28	25	22.2	25.0	28	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Hispanic/Latino	4.9	6.1	49	25	21.3	12.2	49	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	12.3	8.2	61	0	13.8	14.8	61	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	24.4	8.0	50	0	6.7	2.0	50	25
High needs	17.1	2.6	39	0	8.6	2.6	39	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	20.7	3.0	33	0	6.9	3.0	33	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		46.0	60.0	14.0	51.0	No	91	100	Above Target
High needs		41.0	58.5	17.5	51.0	Yes	76	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		41.0	60.0	19.0	51.0	No	61	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		41.0	68.0	27.0	51.0	Yes	39	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		38.0	63.0	25.0	51.0	Yes	37	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		48.5	59.0	10.5	51.0	No	43	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		41.0	32.5	-8.5	51.0	No	94	25	Below Target
High needs		40.0	33.5	-6.5	51.0	No	78	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		44.0	32.5	-11.5	51.0	No	62	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		44.0	44.0	0.0	51.0	No	41	50	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		39.5	39.0	-0.5	51.0	No	37	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		38.5	33.0	-5.5	51.0	No	45	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	82.5	60.0	70.00	25
High needs	82.5	60.0	70.00	25
EL and Former EL	82.5	60.0	70.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	140	138	99	Yes	140	140	100	Yes	54	54	100	Yes
High needs	120	118	98	Yes	120	120	100	Yes	43	43	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	94	92	98	Yes	94	94	100	Yes	36	36	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	65	64	98	Yes	65	65	100	Yes	24	24	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	29	28	97	Yes	29	29	100	Yes	10	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	53	52	98	Yes	53	53	100	Yes	22	22	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	70	69	99	Yes	70	70	100	Yes	26	26	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.