Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Thomas Carroll

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Thomas Carroll

Organization Information

District:

Peabody (02290000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Thomas Carroll (02290010)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Northeast

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		84.0	82.5	82.8	0.3	90.7	92.0	36	300	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		78.4	76.6	75.7	-0.9	87.4	89.2	49	179	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		80.4	80.4	78.9	-1.5	82.0	90.2	60	136	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		78.2	76.3	68.0	-8.3	87.3	89.1	41	68	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		63.3	55.2	52.7	-2.5	78.6	81.7	19	46	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		80.8	75.5	70.7	-4.8	88.8	90.4	42	52	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		85.5	84.1	85.4	1.3	91.5	92.8	34	234	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		75.9	73.9	76.3	2.4	85.9	88.0	18	299	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		69.8	67.6	67.8	0.2	82.4	84.9	20	178	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		69.4	69.4	71.1	1.7	72.0	84.7	29	135	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		77.4	67.4	61.0	-6.4	86.8	88.7	14	68	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		51.2	49.4	41.1	-8.3	71.5	75.6	5	45	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		75.6	59.8	61.1	1.3	85.8	87.8	12	52	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		76.4	77.5	80.0	2.5	86.2	88.2	15	234	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		83.5	78.2	82.6	4.4	90.4	91.8	56	85	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		77.5	75.0	72.8	-2.2	86.9	88.8	68	45	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		78.0	78.0	76.7	-1.3	79.8	89.0	84	30	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		85.7	82.0	85.2	3.2	91.7	92.9	52	71	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	9.2	11.3	300	25	8.0	10.3	300	0
High needs	6.6	7.3	179	25	12.5	16.8	179	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.5	8.8	136	25	8.0	14.0	136	0
EL and Former EL	10.7	2.9	68	0	17.9	23.5	68	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	46	0	32.6	39.1	46	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	8.7	9.6	52	25	15.2	21.2	52	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	9.3	11.5	234	25	5.7	8.1	234	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	14.7	17.4	299	25	15.9	15.1	299	0
High needs	11.8	7.9	178	0	22.4	23.0	178	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	12.5	8.9	135	0	19.6	17.8	135	0
EL and Former EL	14.3	7.4	68	0	19.6	29.4	68	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	45	0	44.2	60.0	45	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	13.0	7.7	52	0	30.4	28.8	52	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	15.5	19.7	234	25	12.4	12.0	234	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	16.5	22.4	85	25	13.9	9.4	85	25
High needs	17.0	8.9	45	0	17.0	17.8	45	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	18.2	10.0	30	0	9.1	10.0	30	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	19.3	25.4	71	25	10.5	8.5	71	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		42.0	42.0	0.0	51.0	No	166	50	Below Target
High needs		37.0	42.0	5.0	51.0	No	97	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		35.0	42.0	7.0	51.0	No	73	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		47.5	49.5	2.0	51.0	No	40	50	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		30.0	28.5	-1.5	51.0	No	26	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		44.5	38.0	-6.5	51.0	No	29	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		42.0	42.0	0.0	51.0	Yes	130	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		46.0	45.0	-1.0	51.0	Yes	166	75	On Target
High needs		46.0	40.0	-6.0	51.0	No	97	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		40.0	41.5	1.5	51.0	No	72	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		40.5	44.0	3.5	51.0	No	41	50	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		45.0	38.0	-7.0	51.0	No	25	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		39.5	38.0	-1.5	51.0	No	29	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		49.0	49.0	0.0	51.0	Yes	131	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	77.5	60.0	48.00	25
High needs	77.5	60.0	48.00	25
EL and Former EL	77.5	60.0	48.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	311	310	100	Yes	310	310	100	Yes	87	87	100	Yes
High needs	190	189	99	Yes	189	189	100	Yes	47	47	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	146	145	99	Yes	145	145	100	Yes	32	32	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	74	73	99	Yes	74	74	100	Yes	22	22	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	47	47	100	Yes	46	46	100	Yes	12	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	53	53	100	Yes	53	53	100	Yes	12	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	4	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	243	242	100	Yes	243	243	100	Yes	73	73	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.