Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Newburyport High
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Newburyport High
Organization Information
District:Newburyport (02040000)School type:High School
School:Newburyport High (02040505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 99.6, Target = 98.8CPI = 99.6, Target = 98.8 98.0 99.3 99.6 0.3 98.8 99.0 87190100Above Target
High needsCPI = 97.7, Target = 95.2CPI = 97.7, Target = 95.2CPI = 97.7, Target = 95.2 91.7 96.5 97.7 1.2 95.2 95.9 7833100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 99.7, Target = 98.8CPI = 99.7, Target = 98.8 97.9 99.5 99.7 0.2 98.8 99.0 81170100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 96.3, Target = 97.5CPI = 96.3, Target = 97.5CPI = 96.3, Target = 97.5 95.7 96.7 96.3 -0.4 97.5 97.9 7819175On Target
High needsCPI = 82.4, Target = 90.6CPI = 82.4, Target = 90.6CPI = 82.4, Target = 90.6 83.8 85.5 82.4 -3.1 90.6 91.9 50340Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.6, Target = 97.4CPI = 96.6, Target = 97.4 95.5 96.8 96.6 -0.2 97.4 97.8 7017175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.3, Target = 94.6CPI = 97.3, Target = 94.6CPI = 97.3, Target = 94.6 90.7 96.9 97.3 0.4 94.6 95.4 85184100Above Target
High needsCPI = 87.9, Target = 86.6CPI = 87.9, Target = 86.6CPI = 87.9, Target = 86.6 77.1 90.6 87.9 -2.7 86.6 88.6 7129100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 97, Target = 94.7CPI = 97, Target = 94.7CPI = 97, Target = 94.7 90.9 96.7 97.0 0.3 94.7 95.5 76166100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 77.4 65.31900 0.0 0.019025
High needs 41.9 21.2330 0.0 0.03325
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 77.2 68.81700 0.0 0.017025
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 79.4 77.01910 1.9 1.019125
High needs 39.5 35.3340 9.3 5.93425
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 79.8 78.41710 1.5 1.217125
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 52.5 44.61840 0.0 0.018425
High needs 10.0 20.72925 0.0 0.02925
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 52.6 45.21660 0.0 0.016625
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 59.5, Target = 51SGP = 59.5, Target = 51SGP = 59.5, Target = 51 62.0 59.5 -2.5 51.0Yes17475On Target
High needsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 58.0 49.0 -9.0 51.0No3050Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 62.0 61.0 -1.0 51.0Yes158100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51 64.0 69.0 5.0 51.0No176100Above Target
High needsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 48.0 54.0 6.0 51.0No3175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51 64.0 69.0 5.0 51.0No160100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 96.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.9, Target = 80 96.3 96.9 0.6 80.0 90.0193100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 88.1, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 88.1, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 88.1, Target = 80 84.4 88.1 3.7 80.0 90.04275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.01--
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.020--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.05--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.02--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.06--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.04--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 97.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.2, Target = 80 97.2 97.2 0.0 80.0 90.0176100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 96.3, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.3, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.3, Target = 85 96.3 96.3 0.0 85.0 95.0160100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 84.4, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 84.4, Target = 85 85.4 84.4 -1.0 85.0 95.03225No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.03--
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.020--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.01--
Asian --- 85.0 95.06--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.04--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.04--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 97.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.2, Target = 85 97.8 97.2 -0.6 85.0 95.0145100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0.4, Target = 0.5 0.8 0.1 0.4 -0.3 0.5 0.47678275On Target
High needsDropout Rate = 0.8, Target = 1.6 2.8 0.0 0.8 -0.8 1.6 1.47412575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------67--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------72--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------16--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.3, Target = 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.3 -0.2 0.4 0.37371775On Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students19619499Yes19619599Yes196196100Yes
High needs343397Yes3434100Yes3434100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged17---17---17---
EL and Former EL1---1---1---
Students w/ disabilities18---18---18---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2---2---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2---2---
Hispanic/Latino9---9---9---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---7---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White17617499Yes17617599Yes176176100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles