Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Millis High School

District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Millis High School

Organization Information
District:Millis (01870000)School type:High School
School:Millis High School (01870505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 99.1, Target = 99.7 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 99.1, Target = 99.775 or Higher All Students 99.4 100.0 99.1 -0.9 99.7 99.7 70109100Above Target
High needs -------18--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 100, Target = 99.7 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 100, Target = 99.775 or Higher White 99.4 100.0 100.0 0.0 99.7 99.7 9799100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 96.1, Target = 98.7 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 96.1, Target = 98.7 75 or Higher All Students 97.8 96.4 96.1 -0.3 98.7 98.9 7610925No Change
High needs -------18--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 97.2, Target = 98.7 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 97.2, Target = 98.7 75 or Higher White 97.7 96.4 97.2 0.8 98.7 98.9 759975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.6, Target = 95.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 93.6, Target = 95.6 75 or Higher All Students 92.4 96.8 93.6 -3.2 95.6 96.2 601090Declined
High needs -------18--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.4, Target = 95.7 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 94.4, Target = 95.7 75 or Higher White 92.6 96.6 94.4 -2.2 95.7 96.3 549925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 71.4 65.11090 0.0 0.91090
High needs--18---18-
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 70.1 65.7990 0.0 0.09925
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 69.0 57.81090 2.4 2.81090
High needs--18---18-
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 67.5 56.6990 2.6 2.09925
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 31.6 19.31090 0.0 0.91090
High needs--18---18-
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 27.0 19.2990 0.0 0.09925
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 57, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 72.0 57.0 -15.0 51.0No10775On Target
High needs --- 51.0-17--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-12--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-2--
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 56, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 5175 or Higher White 71.0 56.0 -15.0 51.0No9875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 39.5, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 39.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 34.0 39.5 5.5 51.0Yes10875On Target
High needs --- 51.0-18--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-13--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-2--
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 40, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 40, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 34.0 40.0 6.0 51.0Yes9875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 94.8, Target = 80 - All StudentsAll Students-Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.8, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.8, Target = 8075 or Higher All Students 96.3 94.8 -1.5 80.0 90.09675On Target
High needs --- 80.0 90.027--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.01--
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.010--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.01--
Asian --- 80.0 90.02--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.02--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.01--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.01--
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 95.5, Target = 80 - WhiteWhite-Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.5, Target = 8075 or Higher White 96.0 95.5 -0.5 80.0 90.088100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 98.1, Target = 85 - All StudentsAll Students-Cohort Graduation Rate = 98.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 98.1, Target = 8575 or Higher All Students 100.0 98.1 -1.9 85.0 95.0108100Above Target
High needs --- 85.0 95.039--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.021--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.01--
Asian --- 85.0 95.03--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.01--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.01--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 98, Target = 85 - WhiteWhite-Cohort Graduation Rate = 98, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 98, Target = 8575 or Higher White 100.0 98.0 -2.0 85.0 95.0101100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 1, Target = 1.2Dropout Rate 75 or Higher All Students 2.0 0.8 1.0 -0.2 1.2 1.05239975On Target
High needs -------71--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------35--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------41--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------4--
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------2--
WhiteDropout Rate = 1.1, Target = 1.1Dropout Rate 75 or Higher White 1.8 0.8 1.1 -0.3 1.1 0.93836275On Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students109109100Yes109109100Yes109109100Yes
High needs18---18---18---
Econ. Disadvantaged13---13---13---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities9---9---9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.2---2---2---
Asian1---1---1---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2---2---
Hispanic/Latino3---3---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White9999100Yes9999100Yes9999100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles