Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lt Clayre Sullivan Middle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Lt Clayre Sullivan Elementary

Organization Information

District:

Holyoke (01370000)

School type:

Elementary-Middle School

School:

Lt Clayre Sullivan Elementary (01370055)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		77.3	75.7	78.0	2.3	86.8	88.7	33	333	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		72.2	71.8	74.5	2.7	83.8	86.1	47	276	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		71.8	71.8	74.3	2.5	74.2	85.9	39	253	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		56.7	64.7	68.6	3.9	74.7	78.4	47	102	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		62.5	59.3	63.3	4.0	78.1	81.3	57	79	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		70.8	71.8	75.4	3.6	83.0	85.4	45	257	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		90.0	90.1	89.7	-0.4	94.2	95.0	53	58	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		69.9	68.5	70.1	1.6	82.4	85.0	33	327	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		64.8	64.2	66.5	2.3	79.5	82.4	43	272	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		64.7	64.7	66.5	1.8	67.6	82.4	43	250	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		54.6	60.3	64.0	3.7	73.5	77.3	47	100	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		59.5	56.6	60.1	3.5	76.4	79.8	69	79	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		62.1	64.6	65.7	1.1	77.9	81.1	35	252	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		86.1	82.9	88.6	5.7	91.9	93.1	71	57	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		57.7	62.4	56.4	-6.0	75.3	78.9	30	118	0	Declined
High needs		53.6	58.9	50.3	-8.6	72.9	76.8	32	96	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		57.2	57.2	50.3	-6.9	60.8	78.6	36	87	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		45.5	52.8	43.3	-9.5	68.2	72.8	42	30	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		55.2	56.9	47.7	-9.2	73.9	77.6	48	33	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		49.4	58.3	49.4	-8.9	70.5	74.7	33	87	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		75.0	-	-	-	-	87.5	-	26	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	3.5	6.6	333	25	12.9	11.7	333	0
High needs	0.4	4.0	276	25	15.6	14.1	276	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.4	4.3	253	25	15.8	15.0	253	0
EL and Former EL	1.0	0.0	102	0	20.6	16.7	102	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	79	0	27.9	31.6	79	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Hispanic/Latino	1.2	3.1	257	25	15.5	13.2	257	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	12.7	24.1	58	25	4.8	3.4	58	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	8.6	10.4	327	25	22.4	22.6	327	0
High needs	4.7	5.5	272	25	26.3	25.4	272	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.4	6.0	250	25	25.9	24.4	250	0
EL and Former EL	2.0	4.0	100	25	26.5	28.0	100	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	1.3	79	25	37.9	35.4	79	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Hispanic/Latino	4.7	4.8	252	0	25.3	26.2	252	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	27.0	38.6	57	25	11.1	8.8	57	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.8	2.5	118	25	23.4	32.2	118	0
High needs	0.0	1.0	96	25	27.6	36.5	96	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	1.1	87	25	30.3	36.8	87	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	30	0	33.3	43.3	30	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	33	0	37.9	42.4	33	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	1.1	87	25	28.6	39.1	87	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	26	-	-	-	26	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		53.0	52.0	-1.0	51.0	No	253	75	On Target
High needs		51.0	52.0	1.0	51.0	No	206	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		51.0	50.5	-0.5	51.0	No	188	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		54.5	53.0	-1.5	51.0	Yes	77	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		44.0	53.0	9.0	51.0	No	51	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		52.5	51.0	-1.5	51.0	No	191	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		56.5	68.0	11.5	51.0	No	48	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		44.0	52.0	8.0	51.0	No	247	75	On Target
High needs		44.0	52.5	8.5	51.0	No	202	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		44.0	51.0	7.0	51.0	No	185	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		51.0	57.5	6.5	51.0	No	76	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		47.0	67.0	20.0	51.0	Yes	51	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		44.0	50.0	6.0	51.0	No	187	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		41.0	59.0	18.0	51.0	Yes	46	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	74.0	60.0	73.00	25
High needs	74.0	60.0	73.00	25
EL and Former EL	74.0	60.0	73.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	360	357	99	Yes	360	350	97	Yes	123	122	99	Yes
High needs	303	300	99	Yes	303	295	97	Yes	101	100	99	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	277	277	100	Yes	277	273	99	Yes	91	91	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	114	112	98	Yes	114	110	96	Yes	32	31	97	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	88	86	98	Yes	88	86	98	Yes	36	35	97	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	277	275	99	Yes	277	269	97	Yes	92	91	99	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	61	60	98	Yes	61	59	97	Yes	26	26	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.