Joshua Romano, Principal Mailing Address: 122 Granite Street Leominster, MA 01453
Phone: (978) 534-7715 FAX: (978) 537-1765 Website: http://www.leominsterschools.org
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2016-17 School Year)
Note: School achievement percentiles (1-99) compare each group’s average scaled score to the average scaled scores of the same group from all public schools across the state. Only students enrolled in the same school since October 1 are included in calculations, and groups with fewer than 10 students do not receive percentiles.
2017 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
18
100
0
50
44
6
80.6
N/A
N/A
311
99
5
18
41
36
59.2
N/A
N/A
39,271
98
4
18
41
38
59.1
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
95
99
0
18
49
33
55.5
N/A
N/A
20,120
99
3
16
44
37
54.7
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
45
99
29
40
29
2
88.3
N/A
N/A
516
99
9
29
41
21
70.4
N/A
N/A
66,270
99
7
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
High needs
61
99
21
43
34
2
86.1
N/A
N/A
700
99
8
28
42
22
68.7
N/A
N/A
93,555
99
6
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
105
100
10
34
38
18
73.1
N/A
N/A
17,823
99
6
25
43
26
64.6
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
460
98
10
31
40
20
71.6
N/A
N/A
Asian
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
44
100
20
41
34
5
83.0
N/A
N/A
13,554
100
30
38
25
7
86.1
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
42
100
19
55
24
2
89.9
N/A
N/A
413
100
5
29
46
20
68.2
N/A
N/A
37,380
99
6
24
42
27
63.2
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
38
100
21
45
26
8
84.9
N/A
N/A
6,659
99
20
35
33
13
79.1
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
174
99
16
31
34
19
74.6
N/A
N/A
White
128
99
52
37
11
0
96.7
N/A
N/A
736
99
22
42
27
8
84.7
N/A
N/A
133,323
99
20
41
31
8
83.6
N/A
N/A
Male
89
99
46
36
17
1
93.5
N/A
N/A
719
99
18
35
34
13
78.3
N/A
N/A
106,879
99
17
36
33
14
77.8
N/A
N/A
Female
105
99
39
49
12
0
95.7
N/A
N/A
619
100
14
40
34
12
78.8
N/A
N/A
102,501
99
17
37
34
12
78.8
N/A
N/A
EL
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
40
99
0
3
50
48
43.1
N/A
N/A
11,915
98
1
7
40
52
43.7
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
40
100
10
58
30
3
87.5
N/A
N/A
234
100
6
28
45
21
67.9
N/A
N/A
34,852
99
8
25
40
26
64.4
N/A
N/A
Migrant
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
43
98
0
16
16
67
41.9
N/A
N/A
All Students
2017
194
99
42
43
14
1
94.7
N/A
N/A
1,338
100
16
37
34
13
78.6
N/A
N/A
209,416
99
17
36
34
13
78.3
N/A
N/A
2016
176
100
30
55
12
4
93.2
N/A
N/A
1,349
100
12
37
39
12
78.3
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2017 Official Accountability Data - Leominster High School
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 2
Not meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
23
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
70
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
68
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
60
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
63
Did Not Meet Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
81
Met Target
Leominster High School: Accountability Data Detail
2017 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
94.7
96.0
95.8
-0.2
97.4
97.4
25
280
25
No Change
High needs
89.8
91.1
90.7
-0.4
94.9
94.9
19
123
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
90.6
92.6
92.7
0.1
92.2
95.3
25
96
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
76.0
86.3
82.5
-3.8
88.0
88.0
15
50
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
96.4
98.3
99.0
0.7
98.2
98.2
94
24
100
Above Target
Hispanic/Latino
85.8
88.8
90.1
1.3
92.9
92.9
35
71
50
Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
97.6
98.5
97.7
-0.8
98.8
98.8
24
165
100
Above Target
2017 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
87.1
84.0
90.8
6.8
93.6
93.6
38
282
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
78.2
68.1
82.5
14.4
89.1
89.1
46
123
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
79.5
73.3
85.3
12.0
82.9
89.8
54
95
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
56.7
54.7
71.0
16.3
78.4
78.4
41
50
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
82.1
87.9
85.4
-2.5
91.1
91.1
67
24
25
No Change
Hispanic/Latino
72.6
66.4
82.0
15.6
86.3
86.3
57
71
50
Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
92.0
90.2
94.5
4.3
96.0
96.0
50
167
50
Improved Below Target
2017 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
88.6
93.2
94.7
1.5
94.3
94.3
65
194
75
On Target
High needs
78.3
80.3
86.1
5.8
89.2
89.2
66
61
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
80.0
83.3
88.3
5.0
83.3
90.0
70
45
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
72.9
72.2
89.9
17.7
86.5
86.5
86
42
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
92.5
97.1
96.7
-0.4
96.3
96.3
74
128
75
On Target
2017 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
33.3
35.0
280
0
1.9
1.4
280
25
High needs
18.9
16.3
123
0
4.5
3.3
123
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
23.9
20.8
96
0
3.4
2.1
96
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
17
-
-
-
17
-
Students w/ disabilities
6.7
2.0
50
0
8.3
6.0
50
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Asian
-
-
11
-
-
-
11
-
Afr. Amer./Black
44.8
20.8
24
0
0.0
0.0
24
25
Hispanic/Latino
11.8
16.9
71
25
6.6
4.2
71
25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
39.2
45.5
165
25
0.5
0.0
165
25
2017 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
45.9
53.2
282
25
11.8
3.9
282
25
High needs
18.3
28.5
123
25
26.0
8.9
123
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
23.9
34.7
95
25
19.3
7.4
95
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
15
-
-
-
15
-
Students w/ disabilities
5.1
12.0
50
25
39.0
16.0
50
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Asian
-
-
11
-
-
-
11
-
Afr. Amer./Black
31.0
25.0
24
0
10.3
0.0
24
25
Hispanic/Latino
23.3
36.6
71
25
27.4
12.7
71
25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
55.7
63.5
167
25
6.0
1.2
167
25
2017 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
29.5
42.3
194
25
4.0
0.5
194
25
High needs
10.6
21.3
61
25
14.9
1.6
61
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
12.1
28.9
45
25
12.1
2.2
45
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
18
-
-
-
18
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
Hispanic/Latino
18.5
19.0
42
0
25.9
2.4
42
25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
32.6
52.3
128
25
0.0
0.0
128
25
2017 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
42.0
31.0
-11.0
51.0
No
254
25
Below Target
High needs
40.0
31.0
-9.0
51.0
No
108
25
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
38.0
29.5
-8.5
51.0
No
86
0
Below Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
11
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
37.0
33.0
-4.0
51.0
No
45
25
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
7
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
57.0
57.0
0.0
51.0
Yes
21
75
On Target
Hispanic/Latino
47.0
33.0
-14.0
51.0
Yes
66
75
On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
8
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
40.0
30.0
-10.0
51.0
No
151
0
Below Target
2017 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
42.0
40.0
-2.0
51.0
Yes
252
75
On Target
High needs
41.5
31.5
-10.0
51.0
Yes
104
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
36.0
30.5
-5.5
51.0
Yes
82
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
9
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
42.0
44.0
2.0
51.0
Yes
41
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
0
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
7
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
54.0
31.0
-23.0
51.0
No
21
25
Below Target
Hispanic/Latino
31.0
31.0
0.0
51.0
Yes
65
75
On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
8
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
46.0
39.0
-7.0
51.0
Yes
151
75
On Target
2017 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2017 SGPA
2017 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
61.0
60.0
38
25
High needs
61.0
60.0
38
25
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
38
-
2016 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
89.7
90.5
0.8
80.0
90.0
263
75
On Target
High needs
81.0
85.5
4.5
80.0
90.0
138
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
14
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
66.7
84.4
17.7
80.0
90.0
45
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
7
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
89.7
95.5
5.8
80.0
90.0
22
100
Above Target
Hispanic/Latino
79.2
82.1
2.9
80.0
90.0
67
75
On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
8
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
White
93.3
93.7
0.4
80.0
90.0
158
75
On Target
2015 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
93.4
91.3
-2.1
85.0
95.0
312
75
On Target
High needs
86.5
83.4
-3.1
85.0
95.0
163
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
22
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
86.5
72.2
-14.3
85.0
95.0
54
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
13
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
29
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
83.1
83.3
0.2
85.0
95.0
72
25
No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
96.8
94.3
-2.5
85.0
95.0
193
75
On Target
2016 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
2.2
1.1
0.8
0.3
1.1
1.1
58
1771
75
On Target
High needs
4.5
2.5
1.4
1.1
2.3
2.3
62
740
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
2.4
2.4
1.0
1.4
2.2
1.2
69
481
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
72
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
7.2
3.6
0.9
2.7
3.6
3.6
71
333
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
68
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.7
0.7
78
142
100
Above Target
Hispanic/Latino
4.7
1.2
1.7
-0.5
2.4
2.4
59
470
75
On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
42
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
1.6
1.2
0.7
0.5
0.8
0.8
54
1045
75
On Target
2017 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
All students
303
295
97
Yes
301
298
99
Yes
304
302
99
Yes
High needs
141
135
96
Yes
139
136
98
Yes
142
141
99
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
109
104
95
Yes
107
104
97
Yes
110
109
99
Yes
EL and Former EL
30
29
97
Yes
29
28
97
Yes
30
30
100
Yes
Students w/ disabilities
53
49
95
Yes
51
50
98
Yes
53
53
100
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
Asian
12
-
-
-
12
-
-
-
12
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
28
28
100
Yes
28
28
100
Yes
28
28
100
Yes
Hispanic/Latino
83
80
96
Yes
82
81
99
Yes
84
84
100
Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
8
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
171
166
97
Yes
170
168
99
Yes
171
169
99
Yes
NOTE: In 2017, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2017 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2017 participation rate was lower than 95 percent (high schools) or 90 percent (schools and districts administering Next-Generation MCAS test in grades 3-8) for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2017 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.
