John Smith, Principal Mailing Address: 9 Junction Street Dover, MA 02030
Phone: (508) 785-1730 FAX: (508) 785-8141 Website: http://www.doversherborn.org Organization Description: Dover-Sherborn Regional High School
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
98.2
99.1
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
335
578
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
99.1
99.5
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.9
0.5
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
11.7 to 1
11.1 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
0.0
0.9
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
15
94
53
47
0
0
100.0
N/A
15
109
96
12
61
20
7
90.4
56.0
99
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
27
100
41
44
7
7
93.5
54.0
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
23
96
61
35
4
0
98.9
71.5
22
133
97
18
58
17
7
91.4
56.0
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
100
13
56
25
6
89.1
N/A
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
14
100
93
0
7
0
98.2
N/A
11
51
100
69
24
4
4
97.1
59.0
46
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
21
100
29
71
0
0
100.0
48.0
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
28
100
46
54
0
0
100.0
63.5
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
138
99
90
10
0
0
100.0
69.0
126
580
99
43
51
5
1
98.0
54.0
546
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
70
99
84
16
0
0
100.0
82.0
64
350
99
33
58
7
2
96.6
56.0
329
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
94
99
95
4
1
0
99.7
65.0
85
347
99
55
41
3
0
99.1
52.0
327
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever EL
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
22
100
32
55
9
5
93.2
76.0
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
164
99
90
9
1
0
99.8
71.0
149
697
99
44
50
5
1
97.8
55.0
656
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
157
99
90
10
0
0
100.0
72.0
145
679
99
43
51
4
1
98.0
58.0
640
216,396
99
-
-
-
-
-
50.0
175,934
ALL GRADES - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
14
88
50
43
0
7
94.6
N/A
13
110
97
17
35
27
21
75.7
52.0
99
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
27
100
48
26
11
15
87.0
40.0
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
22
92
64
32
0
5
96.6
55.0
20
134
98
24
34
23
19
78.7
51.0
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
100
19
6
38
38
59.4
N/A
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
13
93
100
0
0
0
100.0
N/A
10
50
98
86
8
2
4
97.5
68.0
45
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
21
100
48
38
14
0
95.2
49.0
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
28
100
68
14
11
7
92.0
50.0
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
137
98
89
9
1
1
99.1
61.0
125
582
99
59
29
9
4
94.4
52.0
546
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
70
99
81
17
1
0
99.6
65.0
64
351
100
57
28
8
6
93.2
55.0
329
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
92
97
95
2
2
1
98.6
66.0
83
347
99
63
24
11
3
94.3
49.0
326
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever EL
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
22
100
73
14
5
9
92.0
61.5
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
162
98
89
9
2
1
99.1
66.0
147
698
99
60
26
9
4
93.7
52.0
655
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
157
99
88
11
1
0
99.8
69.0
146
678
99
59
24
11
6
92.3
55.0
637
216,363
99
-
-
-
-
-
50.0
176,568
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
14
94
21
71
7
0
96.4
N/A
N/A
47
94
15
51
30
4
84.6
N/A
N/A
38,109
98
3
18
41
38
59.7
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18,594
99
3
16
43
39
54.1
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
100
36
43
21
0
89.3
N/A
N/A
61,476
98
6
26
43
25
65.8
N/A
N/A
High needs
22
96
27
64
9
0
95.5
N/A
N/A
61
95
18
51
28
3
85.7
N/A
N/A
89,857
98
6
25
43
26
65.4
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17,761
99
5
24
44
27
63.9
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
422
98
9
33
40
19
71.9
N/A
N/A
Asian
13
100
92
0
8
0
96.2
N/A
N/A
22
100
73
23
5
0
97.7
N/A
N/A
13,043
99
30
39
23
7
86.8
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
100
36
55
9
0
95.5
N/A
N/A
35,316
99
5
24
42
28
62.9
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
100
33
53
13
0
95.0
N/A
N/A
6,053
99
19
36
33
12
79.5
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
208
100
18
32
32
18
75.8
N/A
N/A
White
134
99
69
31
1
0
99.6
N/A
N/A
285
99
41
47
11
1
95.3
N/A
N/A
135,382
99
20
42
30
8
84.1
N/A
N/A
Male
69
99
59
39
1
0
99.3
N/A
N/A
161
99
37
50
11
2
95.2
N/A
N/A
106,211
99
17
37
33
14
78.4
N/A
N/A
Female
90
100
77
22
1
0
99.4
N/A
N/A
179
99
45
42
12
1
94.8
N/A
N/A
102,022
99
17
37
34
12
79.1
N/A
N/A
EL
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11,822
98
1
8
39
51
45.3
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
33,065
99
8
25
40
27
64.2
N/A
N/A
All Students
2016
159
99
69
30
1
0
99.4
N/A
N/A
340
99
41
46
11
1
95.0
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2015
155
99
63
37
1
0
99.7
N/A
N/A
319
98
38
51
10
1
96.2
N/A
N/A
210,454
99
15
39
33
12
79.4
N/A
N/A
2016 Accountability Data - Dover-Sherborn Regional High
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 1
Meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
99
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
100
Met Target
High needs
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
100
Met Target
Dover-Sherborn Regional High: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
99.8
100.0
99.8
-0.2
99.9
99.9
94
164
100
Above Target
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
23
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
99.8
100.0
100.0
0.0
99.9
99.9
97
138
100
Above Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
99.7
99.8
99.1
-0.7
99.8
99.9
98
162
100
Above Target
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
99.7
99.8
99.1
-0.7
99.8
99.9
97
137
100
Above Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
99.7
99.7
99.4
-0.3
99.8
99.9
99
159
100
Above Target
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
99.7
99.6
99.6
0.0
99.8
99.9
99
134
100
Above Target
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
90.4
90.2
164
0
0.0
0.0
164
25
High needs
-
-
23
-
-
-
23
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
15
-
-
-
15
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
14
-
-
-
14
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
92.3
89.9
138
0
0.0
0.0
138
25
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
87.9
88.9
162
0
0.0
0.6
162
0
High needs
-
-
22
-
-
-
22
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
14
-
-
-
14
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
13
-
-
-
13
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
88.1
89.1
137
0
0.0
0.7
137
0
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
62.6
69.2
159
25
0.0
0.0
159
25
High needs
-
-
22
-
-
-
22
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
14
-
-
-
14
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
13
-
-
-
13
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
62.7
68.7
134
0
0.0
0.0
134
25
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
72.0
71.0
-1.0
51.0
No
149
100
Above Target
High needs
-
-
-
51.0
-
22
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
8
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
15
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
11
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
72.0
69.0
-3.0
51.0
No
126
100
Above Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
69.0
66.0
-3.0
51.0
No
147
100
Above Target
High needs
-
-
-
51.0
-
20
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
8
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
13
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
10
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
69.0
61.0
-8.0
51.0
No
125
100
Above Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
3
-
High needs
-
60.0
3
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
3
-
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
98.0
98.0
0.0
80.0
90.0
151
100
Above Target
High needs
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
31
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
23
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
5
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
3
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
White
97.6
98.6
1.0
80.0
90.0
140
100
Above Target
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2013 Rate
2014 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
98.7
98.0
-0.7
85.0
95.0
147
100
Above Target
High needs
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
27
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
22
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
10
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
5
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
5
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
99.3
97.6
-1.7
85.0
95.0
127
100
Above Target
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
84
663
75
On Target
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
99
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
27
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
74
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
37
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
79
582
75
On Target
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
168
166
99
Yes
168
164
98
Yes
168
167
99
Yes
High needs
25
-
-
-
25
-
-
-
25
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
9
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
17
-
-
-
17
-
-
-
17
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
14
-
-
-
14
-
-
-
14
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
6
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
142
140
99
Yes
142
139
98
Yes
142
141
99
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.