Nicholas L Bettencourt, Principal Mailing Address: 1135 North Main Street Fall River, MA 02720
Phone: (508) 675-8340 FAX: (508) 675-8414 Website: http://https://www.fallriverschools.org/morton
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
95.8
94.9
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
200
3,213
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
91.5
93.1
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
8.5
6.9
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
12.7 to 1
14.3 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
7.5
0.9
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
Among lowest performing 20% of schools and subgroups
Focus on Students w/disabilities -
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
18
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
59
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
65
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
47
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
71
Did Not Meet Target
Hispanic/Latino
75
Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
62
Did Not Meet Target
Morton Middle: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
80.2
82.7
80.6
-2.1
88.5
90.1
15
580
25
No Change
High needs
73.9
77.2
75.6
-1.6
84.8
87.0
29
410
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
80.2
80.2
77.8
-2.4
81.9
90.1
23
360
25
No Change
EL and Former EL
49.0
61.0
59.4
-1.6
57.5
74.5
18
40
100
Above Target
Students w/ disabilities
55.8
57.4
55.0
-2.4
74.2
77.9
15
139
25
No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
75.0
78.9
77.2
-1.7
85.4
87.5
32
34
25
No Change
Hispanic/Latino
73.3
75.5
75.0
-0.5
84.4
86.7
28
113
25
No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
78.3
87.5
80.6
-6.9
81.9
89.2
17
36
0
Declined
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
White
81.1
84.7
82.8
-1.9
89.0
90.6
8
372
25
No Change
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
60.3
71.9
65.7
-6.2
76.8
80.2
15
578
0
Declined
High needs
52.9
64.7
58.8
-5.9
72.5
76.5
25
409
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
67.3
67.3
60.9
-6.4
70.0
83.7
22
359
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
37.0
52.2
43.1
-9.1
47.5
68.5
13
40
0
Declined
Students w/ disabilities
35.2
41.9
38.6
-3.3
62.2
67.6
13
138
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
50.5
66.4
55.1
-11.3
71.1
75.3
27
34
0
Declined
Hispanic/Latino
49.6
59.4
59.5
0.1
70.6
74.8
28
113
50
Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
64.2
75.0
70.0
-5.0
70.2
82.1
28
35
75
On Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
White
62.7
75.6
68.2
-7.4
78.2
81.4
8
371
0
Declined
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
60.5
61.7
64.2
2.5
77.0
80.3
22
213
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
49.7
55.6
58.8
3.2
70.7
74.9
39
142
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
56.8
56.8
59.0
2.2
60.4
78.4
35
122
50
Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
30.2
37.5
47.1
9.6
59.3
65.1
31
51
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
40.0
48.7
60.5
11.8
55.0
70.0
64
38
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
65.3
66.5
67.1
0.6
79.8
82.7
12
142
50
Improved Below Target
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
8.6
6.9
580
0
8.9
14.7
580
0
High needs
7.3
4.9
410
0
12.6
19.5
410
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
8.0
5.3
360
0
9.2
17.5
360
0
EL and Former EL
0.0
2.5
40
25
20.6
40.0
40
0
Students w/ disabilities
0.9
0.7
139
0
33.9
39.6
139
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Asian
-
-
21
-
-
-
21
-
Afr. Amer./Black
7.9
2.9
34
0
7.9
20.6
34
0
Hispanic/Latino
4.7
5.3
113
25
14.0
21.2
113
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
12.5
13.9
36
25
6.3
16.7
36
0
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
White
8.6
6.7
372
0
7.8
12.4
372
0
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
17.4
12.6
578
0
22.6
28.7
578
0
High needs
12.7
7.8
409
0
30.8
36.4
409
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
14.2
8.6
359
0
27.6
33.7
359
0
EL and Former EL
2.9
0.0
40
0
47.1
50.0
40
0
Students w/ disabilities
1.8
0.7
138
0
58.6
63.0
138
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Asian
-
-
21
-
-
-
21
-
Afr. Amer./Black
15.8
8.8
34
0
31.6
41.2
34
0
Hispanic/Latino
10.4
5.3
113
0
31.1
35.4
113
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
15.6
8.6
35
0
21.9
25.7
35
0
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
White
19.2
15.6
371
0
19.5
25.9
371
0
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
0.0
2.3
213
25
26.8
25.8
213
0
High needs
0.0
2.8
142
25
36.2
34.5
142
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
0.0
3.3
122
25
34.6
34.4
122
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
14
-
-
-
14
-
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
0.0
51
0
63.3
51.0
51
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Asian
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
13
-
-
-
13
-
Hispanic/Latino
0.0
2.6
38
25
44.7
31.6
38
25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
11
-
-
-
11
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
0.0
2.1
142
25
18.3
21.8
142
0
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
49.0
48.0
-1.0
51.0
No
539
50
Below Target
High needs
49.0
48.0
-1.0
51.0
No
373
50
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
49.0
49.0
0.0
51.0
No
330
50
Below Target
EL and Former EL
53.0
38.0
-15.0
51.0
Yes
39
75
On Target
Students w/ disabilities
43.0
34.0
-9.0
51.0
No
119
25
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
21
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
60.0
60.0
0.0
51.0
No
33
100
Above Target
Hispanic/Latino
58.0
46.0
-12.0
51.0
Yes
102
75
On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
47.0
55.5
8.5
51.0
No
32
75
On Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
White
47.0
48.0
1.0
51.0
No
347
50
Below Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
70.5
44.0
-26.5
51.0
No
537
50
Below Target
High needs
68.5
45.0
-23.5
51.0
No
373
50
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
70.0
45.5
-24.5
51.0
No
330
50
Below Target
EL and Former EL
75.0
52.0
-23.0
51.0
No
39
75
On Target
Students w/ disabilities
54.0
39.0
-15.0
51.0
No
119
25
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
21
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
75.0
50.0
-25.0
51.0
No
33
50
Below Target
Hispanic/Latino
65.5
48.5
-17.0
51.0
No
102
50
Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
77.0
54.0
-23.0
51.0
No
31
75
On Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
White
69.5
41.0
-28.5
51.0
No
346
50
Below Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
13.0
60.0
21
0
High needs
13.0
60.0
21
0
EL and Former EL
13.0
60.0
21
0
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
624
624
100
Yes
623
622
100
Yes
227
226
100
Yes
High needs
443
443
100
Yes
442
442
100
Yes
151
151
100
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
390
390
100
Yes
389
389
100
Yes
131
131
100
Yes
EL and Former EL
43
43
100
Yes
43
43
100
Yes
15
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
146
146
100
Yes
145
145
100
Yes
53
53
100
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Asian
21
-
-
-
21
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
40
40
100
Yes
40
40
100
Yes
15
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
127
127
100
Yes
127
127
100
Yes
41
41
100
Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
39
39
100
Yes
39
38
97
Yes
14
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
391
391
100
Yes
390
390
100
Yes
148
148
100
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.
