Nicole Bottomley, Principal Mailing Address: 201 Franklin Street Wrentham, MA 02093
Phone: (508) 384-1000 FAX: (508) 384-1006 Website: http://www.kingphilip.org
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
100.0
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
348
649
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
100.0
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
0.0
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
16.5 to 1
16.6 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
0.0
0.9
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
18
100
0
94
6
0
97.2
N/A
18
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
21
91
43
52
5
0
97.6
N/A
19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
37
95
24
73
3
0
98.6
47.0
34
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
303
99
66
34
0
0
99.8
45.0
296
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
156
99
56
44
1
0
99.7
49.0
151
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
166
100
75
25
0
0
100.0
44.0
163
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever EL
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
322
99
66
34
0
0
99.8
46.0
314
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
316
99
63
33
3
1
99.1
42.0
303
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
216,396
99
-
-
-
-
-
50.0
175,934
ALL GRADES - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
18
100
17
50
22
11
86.1
N/A
17
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
22
100
59
23
9
9
90.9
45.5
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
38
100
42
37
13
8
90.8
51.0
35
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
301
99
77
16
6
1
97.3
51.0
293
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
156
99
72
19
8
2
96.3
51.0
152
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
164
99
78
18
4
1
98.5
52.0
160
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever EL
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
320
99
75
18
6
1
97.4
51.5
312
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
312
98
67
22
9
2
95.6
54.0
300
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
216,363
99
-
-
-
-
-
50.0
176,568
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
14
95
7
79
14
0
96.4
N/A
N/A
91
97
4
24
45
26
65.7
N/A
N/A
38,109
98
3
18
41
38
59.7
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18,594
99
3
16
43
39
54.1
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
19
95
63
32
5
0
98.7
N/A
N/A
75
96
17
29
37
16
73.0
N/A
N/A
61,476
98
6
26
43
25
65.8
N/A
N/A
High needs
33
97
39
48
12
0
96.2
N/A
N/A
151
98
11
28
42
19
71.5
N/A
N/A
89,857
98
6
25
43
26
65.4
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17,761
99
5
24
44
27
63.9
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
422
98
9
33
40
19
71.9
N/A
N/A
Asian
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
100
33
58
8
0
97.9
N/A
N/A
13,043
99
30
39
23
7
86.8
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
19
100
0
53
47
0
80.3
N/A
N/A
35,316
99
5
24
42
28
62.9
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
100
13
67
20
0
93.3
N/A
N/A
6,053
99
19
36
33
12
79.5
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
208
100
18
32
32
18
75.8
N/A
N/A
White
289
99
62
34
4
0
98.7
N/A
N/A
693
99
28
41
26
5
87.4
N/A
N/A
135,382
99
20
42
30
8
84.1
N/A
N/A
Male
148
99
58
37
5
0
98.3
N/A
N/A
380
99
26
44
25
5
88.4
N/A
N/A
106,211
99
17
37
33
14
78.4
N/A
N/A
Female
160
99
64
33
3
0
99.2
N/A
N/A
367
99
29
39
27
4
86.9
N/A
N/A
102,022
99
17
37
34
12
79.1
N/A
N/A
EL
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11,822
98
1
8
39
51
45.3
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
33,065
99
8
25
40
27
64.2
N/A
N/A
All Students
2016
308
99
61
35
4
0
98.8
N/A
N/A
747
99
28
41
26
5
87.6
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2015
308
100
47
44
7
2
96.4
N/A
N/A
692
99
23
49
23
4
90.2
N/A
N/A
210,454
99
15
39
33
12
79.4
N/A
N/A
2016 Accountability Data - King Philip Regional High
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 1
Meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
77
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
92
Met Target
High needs
87
Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
93
Met Target
King Philip Regional High: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
98.0
99.1
99.8
0.7
98.8
99.0
94
322
100
Above Target
High needs
90.8
96.1
98.6
2.5
94.6
95.4
89
37
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
97.9
99.2
99.8
0.6
98.8
99.0
87
303
100
Above Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
94.1
95.6
97.4
1.8
96.6
97.1
83
320
75
On Target
High needs
74.0
85.1
90.8
5.7
84.8
87.0
85
38
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
94.0
95.8
97.3
1.5
96.5
97.0
77
301
75
On Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
93.3
96.4
98.8
2.4
96.1
96.7
97
308
100
Above Target
High needs
74.5
86.2
96.2
10.0
85.1
87.3
98
33
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
93.5
96.6
98.7
2.1
96.2
96.8
93
289
100
Above Target
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
63.3
65.8
322
0
0.0
0.0
322
25
High needs
25.0
24.3
37
0
0.0
0.0
37
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
21
-
-
-
21
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
18
-
-
-
18
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Asian
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
63.9
66.0
303
0
0.0
0.0
303
25
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
67.0
75.0
320
25
1.6
1.3
320
25
High needs
32.3
42.1
38
25
4.8
7.9
38
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
22
-
-
-
22
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
18
-
-
-
18
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Asian
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
67.8
76.7
301
25
1.7
1.3
301
25
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
47.4
61.4
308
25
1.3
0.0
308
25
High needs
19.0
39.4
33
25
6.9
0.0
33
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
19
-
-
-
19
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
14
-
-
-
14
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Asian
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
47.7
62.3
289
25
1.4
0.0
289
25
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
42.0
46.0
4.0
51.0
Yes
314
75
On Target
High needs
42.5
47.0
4.5
51.0
Yes
34
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
19
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
18
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
42.0
45.0
3.0
51.0
Yes
296
75
On Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
54.0
51.5
-2.5
51.0
Yes
312
75
On Target
High needs
54.0
51.0
-3.0
51.0
Yes
35
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
20
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
17
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
54.0
51.0
-3.0
51.0
Yes
293
75
On Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
1
-
High needs
-
60.0
1
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
1
-
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
94.2
97.1
2.9
80.0
90.0
274
100
Above Target
High needs
75.4
90.0
14.6
80.0
90.0
60
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
33
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
2
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
2
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
White
94.1
97.3
3.2
80.0
90.0
260
100
Above Target
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2013 Rate
2014 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
94.7
95.1
0.4
85.0
95.0
325
100
Above Target
High needs
86.9
78.9
-8.0
85.0
95.0
57
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
38
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
94.5
95.0
0.5
85.0
95.0
323
100
Above Target
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
2.3
0.8
0.6
0.2
1.3
1.2
66
1294
75
On Target
High needs
2.5
3.0
4.1
-1.1
1.5
1.3
26
169
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
69
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
115
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
2.2
0.7
0.7
0.0
1.3
1.1
53
1225
75
On Target
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
324
322
99
Yes
324
321
99
Yes
324
320
99
Yes
High needs
39
37
95
Yes
39
39
100
Yes
39
38
97
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
22
-
-
-
22
-
-
-
22
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
19
-
-
-
19
-
-
-
19
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
Asian
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
305
303
99
Yes
305
302
99
Yes
305
301
99
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.