Brian O'donoghue, Principal Mailing Address: P O Box 738 Groton, MA 01450-0738
Phone: (978) 448-6665 FAX: (978) 448-3988 Website: http://www.gdrsd.org/FRES/
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
100.0
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
167
873
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
99.5
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
0.5
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
14.5 to 1
14.1 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
0.0
0.9
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
NOTE: Spring 2016 results in grades 3-8 ELA and Mathematics are not reported because all students in this organization participated in the PARCC test.
Data Under Review or Fewer than 10 students were tested.
2016 PARCC Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
Achievement Levels: L5 = Level 5: Exceeded Expectations (varies by grade - 850) L4 = Level 4: Met Expectations (750 - varies by grade) L3 = Level 3: Approached Expectations (725-749) L2 = Level 2: Partially met Expectations (700-724) L1 = Level 1: Did not meet Expectations (650-699)
Trans. SGP = Transitional Student Growth Percentile
generated using current PARCC and prior MCAS scores Trans. CPI = Transitional Composite Performance Index
generated using linked PARCC and MCAS scores
NOTE: Since only a portion of students in grades 3-8 participated in 2016 PARCC in ELA/L and Mathematics, a representative sample of students from across Massachusetts was used to estimate student achievement at the state level in those subjects. NOTE: Students who took the Alternate Assessment are included in Mean CPI, but not in achievement level or growth results.
Data Last Updated on September 24, 2016
GRADE 3 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
23
100
0
26
35
22
17
74.0
--
--
35
100
0
37
34
17
11
80.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
9
100
--
--
11
100
0
55
36
0
9
86.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
3
--
--
3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
12
100
0
8
42
25
25
67.9
--
--
23
100
0
35
35
17
13
79.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
3
--
--
4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
5
--
--
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
3
--
--
4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
5
--
--
5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
84
100
11
60
20
5
5
91.0
--
--
141
100
13
63
17
4
3
93.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
45
100
11
60
16
7
7
88.6
--
--
81
100
10
68
14
5
4
92.4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
55
100
11
58
20
7
4
92.0
--
--
80
100
16
57
18
6
3
92.9
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
88
100
13
66
15
5
2
94.0
--
--
138
100
15
67
12
4
1
95.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
91
100
12
59
16
8
4
91.0
--
--
150
100
14
63
14
6
3
93.1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
2
--
--
2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
1
--
--
1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
4
--
--
4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
100
100
11
59
18
7
5
90.4
--
--
161
100
13
63
16
6
3
92.6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 3 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
23
100
4
22
35
35
4
74.0
--
--
35
100
6
34
34
23
3
82.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
9
100
--
--
11
100
18
27
55
0
0
98.1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
3
--
--
3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
12
100
0
17
17
58
8
62.5
--
--
23
100
4
39
22
30
4
79.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
3
--
--
4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
5
--
--
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
3
--
--
4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
5
--
--
5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
84
100
15
52
20
11
1
91.3
--
--
141
100
22
54
16
7
1
94.2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
45
100
20
53
16
9
2
91.3
--
--
81
100
25
57
12
5
1
95.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
55
100
13
51
24
11
2
90.2
--
--
80
100
20
49
21
9
1
92.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
88
100
18
57
20
3
1
95.2
--
--
138
100
25
55
16
3
1
96.6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
91
100
16
54
16
11
2
89.9
--
--
150
100
23
55
14
7
1
93.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
2
--
--
2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
1
--
--
1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
4
--
--
4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
100
100
16
52
20
10
2
90.7
--
--
161
100
22
53
17
7
1
93.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 4 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
31
97
10
55
13
19
3
80.5
65.0
31
50
96
8
48
28
14
2
79.3
55.0
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
10
91
20
40
20
20
0
82.5
--
10
15
94
20
47
20
13
0
85.0
--
14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
1
--
1
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
22
96
5
55
14
23
5
77.2
67.0
22
37
95
3
49
30
16
3
77.6
60.0
35
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
4
--
4
5
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
4
--
4
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
3
--
3
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
122
98
23
58
12
6
1
92.0
64.0
121
178
98
21
59
15
5
1
91.6
64.0
171
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
64
97
14
63
13
9
2
88.7
59.0
63
93
97
12
65
15
8
1
89.1
56.0
89
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
70
100
30
57
10
3
0
95.4
69.0
70
99
100
28
57
12
3
0
94.3
70.0
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
112
99
26
61
11
3
0
95.3
60.0
111
155
99
25
63
10
3
0
95.3
62.0
150
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
124
99
23
61
10
5
1
93.0
63.0
123
177
99
20
62
13
5
1
92.3
62.0
171
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
1
--
1
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
134
99
22
60
11
6
1
92.2
62.0
133
192
98
20
60
14
5
1
91.8
61.0
185
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 4 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
31
97
3
52
32
13
0
82.8
72.0
31
50
96
6
50
34
8
2
83.2
63.0
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
10
91
10
40
40
10
0
87.5
--
10
15
94
20
40
33
7
0
90.0
--
14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
1
--
1
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
22
96
0
55
27
18
0
79.3
63.0
22
37
95
3
51
32
11
3
80.1
55.0
35
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
4
--
4
5
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
5
--
5
5
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
3
--
3
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
122
98
12
60
22
5
1
90.2
62.0
121
178
98
11
62
21
4
1
90.6
60.0
171
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
64
97
9
63
23
3
2
90.2
62.0
63
93
97
10
65
22
3
1
91.2
59.0
89
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
71
100
15
59
20
6
0
91.0
72.0
71
100
100
13
62
20
4
1
90.8
69.0
97
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
113
99
15
62
20
2
1
92.9
68.0
112
156
99
13
66
18
2
1
93.8
68.0
151
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
125
99
13
62
20
4
1
90.9
63.0
124
178
99
11
65
20
3
1
91.1
62.0
172
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
1
--
1
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
135
99
13
61
21
4
1
90.6
68.0
134
193
98
11
63
21
4
1
91.0
64.0
186
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
54
98
6
43
22
20
9
77.6
65.0
31
244
98
6
30
34
19
10
76.8
39.0
197
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
19
95
11
47
26
11
5
83.8
--
10
82
99
11
37
28
16
9
80.2
37.0
70
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
4
--
1
13
100
0
46
31
15
8
78.8
--
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
34
97
3
38
24
24
12
73.6
67.0
22
180
98
3
26
35
23
13
73.0
36.0
145
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
7
--
4
16
100
19
50
6
19
6
84.4
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
9
100
--
4
65
100
25
58
14
3
0
96.2
49.0
55
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
3
--
--
15
100
0
73
27
0
0
93.3
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
8
--
3
15
100
13
60
13
13
0
86.7
--
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
1
--
1
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
206
99
18
59
16
5
2
91.6
64.0
121
1,009
99
22
53
16
6
3
92.4
48.0
834
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
109
98
13
61
14
8
4
88.6
59.0
63
585
99
16
56
18
7
4
90.7
45.0
481
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
125
100
22
58
14
5
2
93.9
69.0
70
540
99
28
53
13
5
1
94.4
54.0
444
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
200
100
20
63
13
4
1
94.8
60.0
111
945
99
25
60
12
3
0
96.5
51.0
780
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
215
100
18
60
13
6
2
92.2
63.0
123
1,043
99
23
56
15
5
2
93.4
49.0
855
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
2
--
--
9
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
2
--
1
4
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
5
--
1
23
100
0
39
43
13
4
79.3
--
19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
234
99
18
59
14
6
3
91.5
62.0
133
1,125
99
22
54
16
6
2
92.4
48.0
925
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
247
99
15
55
19
8
3
88.6
55.0
113
1,168
99
18
54
19
6
2
92.0
48.0
957
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 MATH
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
54
98
4
39
33
22
2
78.9
72.0
31
244
98
7
37
30
21
5
76.7
53.0
202
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
19
95
11
37
47
5
0
92.5
--
10
82
99
11
40
28
17
4
80.5
53.0
70
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
4
--
1
13
100
15
54
15
8
8
82.7
--
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
34
97
0
41
24
32
3
73.0
63.0
22
180
98
4
33
29
26
7
72.1
52.0
150
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
7
--
4
16
100
13
56
19
6
6
85.9
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
10
100
30
60
10
0
0
95.5
--
5
67
100
40
48
9
3
0
96.0
64.0
56
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
3
--
--
15
100
0
60
33
7
0
91.7
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
8
--
3
15
100
20
60
20
0
0
95.0
--
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
1
--
1
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
206
99
14
57
21
7
1
90.6
62.0
121
1,008
99
18
57
18
6
1
91.8
56.0
834
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
109
98
14
59
20
6
2
90.7
62.0
63
586
99
18
56
18
6
2
91.5
55.0
483
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
126
100
14
56
21
8
1
90.6
72.0
71
540
99
19
57
17
6
1
92.6
58.0
443
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
201
100
16
60
20
2
1
93.9
68.0
112
946
99
21
61
15
2
0
96.1
58.0
776
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
216
100
14
59
19
7
1
90.5
63.0
124
1,044
99
19
58
17
5
1
92.9
57.0
856
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
2
--
--
9
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
2
--
1
4
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
5
--
1
24
100
8
63
21
4
4
90.6
76.0
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
235
99
14
57
21
7
1
90.7
68.0
134
1,126
99
19
57
18
6
1
92.0
57.0
926
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
249
100
10
58
22
8
1
90.9
59.0
115
1,175
99
16
56
20
7
1
91.4
62.0
964
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 Accountability Data - Florence Roche School
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 1
Meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
83
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
86
Met Target
High needs
89
Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
70
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
84
Met Target
Florence Roche School: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
89.3
88.6
91.5
2.9
93.8
94.7
77
237
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
69.7
73.7
77.6
3.9
82.3
84.9
60
57
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
65.1
65.4
73.6
8.2
79.6
82.6
74
37
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
90.6
89.2
91.6
2.4
94.5
95.3
70
208
50
Improved Below Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
87.0
90.9
90.6
-0.3
92.4
93.5
74
237
25
No Change
High needs
64.6
76.6
78.9
2.3
79.4
82.3
63
57
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
59.6
72.6
73.0
0.4
76.4
79.8
72
37
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
87.6
91.4
90.6
-0.8
92.8
93.8
66
208
25
No Change
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
13.9
16.5
237
25
4.0
2.5
237
25
High needs
5.1
3.5
57
0
13.6
7.0
57
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
20
-
-
-
20
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Students w/ disabilities
5.1
2.7
37
0
20.5
10.8
37
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
10
-
-
-
10
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
White
14.0
17.3
208
25
3.2
2.4
208
25
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
34.8
38.8
237
25
3.6
5.1
237
0
High needs
16.4
22.8
57
25
13.1
14.0
57
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
20
-
-
-
20
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Students w/ disabilities
12.2
13.5
37
25
17.1
18.9
37
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
10
-
-
-
10
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
White
33.9
38.5
208
25
3.1
4.8
208
0
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
55.0
62.0
7.0
51.0
Yes
133
100
Above Target
High needs
48.5
65.0
16.5
51.0
No
31
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
10
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
22
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
White
56.0
64.0
8.0
51.0
Yes
121
100
Above Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
59.0
67.0
8.0
51.0
No
133
100
Above Target
High needs
66.0
72.0
6.0
51.0
Yes
31
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
10
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
22
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
White
59.5
62.0
2.5
51.0
No
121
100
Above Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
6
-
High needs
-
60.0
6
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
6
-
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
243
241
99
Yes
243
241
99
Yes
-
-
-
-
High needs
58
57
98
Yes
58
57
98
Yes
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
21
-
-
-
21
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
4
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
38
37
97
Yes
38
37
97
Yes
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
10
-
-
-
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
7
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
8
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
214
212
99
Yes
214
212
99
Yes
-
-
-
-
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.