• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation
• PARCC Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 2015 2016 ADVANCED 61 57 62 64 PROFICIENT 35 40 33 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 1 3 3 2 FAILING 3 1 2 1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 2015 2016 ADVANCED 60 63 65 73 PROFICIENT 29 25 21 18 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 7 10 9 6 FAILING 4 2 4 3

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 2015 2016 ADVANCED 49 41 46 60 PROFICIENT 41 49 42 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 7 8 5 FAILING 2 2 3 0

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 15 PROFICIENT 64 74 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 7 10 WARNING 4 2

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 22 PROFICIENT 34 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 29 WARNING 14 9

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 2015 2016 ADVANCED 3 5 4 4 PROFICIENT 45 55 55 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 42 33 36 41 WARNING 10 7 5 8

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 13 PROFICIENT 64 71 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 15 WARNING 1 2

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 ADVANCED 29 27 PROFICIENT 40 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 26 WARNING 10 10

NOTE: Spring 2016 results in grades 3-8 ELA and Mathematics are not reported because all students in this organization participated in the PARCC test.