• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• Legacy MCAS Open Response Item Results
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 33 37 45 41 PROFICIENT 51 51 46 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 9 7 8 FAILING 3 3 2 3

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 48 50 55 53 PROFICIENT 29 28 25 25 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 15 13 15 FAILING 7 7 7 7

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 24 26 29 PROFICIENT 47 45 45 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 25 24 24 FAILING 7 6 5 5

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 18 20 14 PROFICIENT 59 63 58 65 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 14 15 14 WARNING 6 6 7 8

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 22 22 19 PROFICIENT 29 30 32 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 28 25 29 WARNING 21 19 20 19

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 5 4 4 PROFICIENT 35 38 35 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 42 38 43 41 WARNING 19 20 18 18

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 15 12 11 PROFICIENT 59 56 59 61 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 21 22 21 WARNING 6 7 7 7

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 20 19 17 PROFICIENT 32 31 33 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 30 27 26 WARNING 22 18 21 24

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 18 16 16 PROFICIENT 51 48 51 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 22 23 23 WARNING 9 11 10 9

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 26 27 25 29 PROFICIENT 32 33 35 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 24 24 25 WARNING 16 16 15 15

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 17 18 18 PROFICIENT 50 44 47 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 28 24 26 WARNING 9 11 10 10

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 25 28 30 PROFICIENT 34 32 33 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 26 25 24 WARNING 15 17 14 15

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 22 20 20 PROFICIENT 36 30 31 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 34 36 34 WARNING 15 14 12 13

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 13 10 13 PROFICIENT 43 44 43 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 30 33 33 WARNING 12 14 13 13

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 16 18 20 PROFICIENT 32 35 34 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 42 36 38 36 WARNING 11 12 10 12

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 15 12 12 PROFICIENT 50 46 45 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 30 36 33 WARNING 9 9 8 10

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 27 31 31 PROFICIENT 52 34 36 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 25 22 21 WARNING 10 14 11 11

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.