MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 36 33 26 38 PROFICIENT 56 51 65 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 7 9 8 9 WARNING 1 7 1 0

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 43 51 43 67 PROFICIENT 36 33 44 20 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 14 12 13 12 WARNING 6 4 1 0

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 47 28 27 PROFICIENT 42 30 45 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 17 26 27 WARNING 7 5 1 2

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 26 35 30 PROFICIENT 60 65 55 56 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 6 9 14 WARNING 8 3 1 0

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 33 32 44 23 PROFICIENT 39 47 40 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 17 16 27 WARNING 4 4 0 4

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 33 25 26 PROFICIENT 65 58 60 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 9 13 18 WARNING 1 0 3 1

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 34 51 51 65 PROFICIENT 58 30 36 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 7 19 8 6 WARNING 1 0 4 1

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.