• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 29 38 44 34 PROFICIENT 61 57 49 56 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 5 5 7 FAILING 1 0 2 3

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 53 51 61 52 PROFICIENT 33 31 23 28 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 12 15 11 12 FAILING 2 3 5 7

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 29 29 36 28 PROFICIENT 56 59 46 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 11 15 14 FAILING 2 2 3 3

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 13 17 12 PROFICIENT 70 73 68 73 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 9 13 12 WARNING 4 5 2 4

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 16 19 9 PROFICIENT 33 36 41 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 36 28 38 WARNING 14 12 12 14

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 2 3 2 PROFICIENT 42 46 44 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 44 40 47 47 WARNING 9 12 5 13

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 10 8 11 PROFICIENT 69 68 71 75 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 20 19 11 WARNING 3 2 3 3

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 23 16 16 PROFICIENT 38 37 39 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 32 35 30 WARNING 13 7 11 16

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 15 15 11 PROFICIENT 64 65 62 64 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 16 18 20 WARNING 4 4 5 5

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 31 26 20 28 PROFICIENT 38 41 47 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 27 23 29 WARNING 8 7 10 9

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 18 12 15 PROFICIENT 66 52 56 58 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 25 29 22 WARNING 4 5 4 5

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 31 33 35 PROFICIENT 43 38 38 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 23 22 22 WARNING 6 8 8 9

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 24 20 16 PROFICIENT 42 34 36 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 36 39 34 WARNING 7 6 5 6

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 19 9 15 PROFICIENT 52 52 53 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 23 29 27 WARNING 4 6 10 5

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 24 22 22 PROFICIENT 42 42 46 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 30 26 39 WARNING 4 3 6 7

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 17 16 13 PROFICIENT 57 53 51 57 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 23 30 26 WARNING 2 6 3 4

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 33 34 38 PROFICIENT 53 36 41 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 21 19 15 WARNING 4 9 6 6

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.