• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• Legacy MCAS Open Response Item Results
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 36 40 50 58 PROFICIENT 58 53 46 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 4 6 2 5 FAILING 2 0 1 2

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 55 58 59 55 PROFICIENT 32 29 24 26 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 11 13 11 FAILING 3 3 4 7

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 25 20 21 PROFICIENT 53 55 46 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 19 32 21 FAILING 3 1 2 4

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 16 20 16 PROFICIENT 75 69 61 72 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 11 11 14 9 WARNING 3 4 5 3

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 25 26 13 PROFICIENT 27 31 30 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 30 28 36 WARNING 16 13 16 16

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 4 0 3 PROFICIENT 41 42 36 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 46 42 51 43 WARNING 10 12 12 10

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 11 11 7 PROFICIENT 61 69 67 70 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 15 19 18 WARNING 6 5 3 4

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 23 22 15 PROFICIENT 36 38 39 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 28 27 27 WARNING 15 10 12 25

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 21 14 15 PROFICIENT 61 52 55 62 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 22 22 19 WARNING 7 5 8 4

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 23 24 28 PROFICIENT 37 37 33 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 29 27 29 WARNING 10 11 16 13

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 15 12 12 PROFICIENT 51 50 57 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 30 24 29 WARNING 5 6 7 7

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 20 26 24 PROFICIENT 42 37 41 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 28 25 26 WARNING 9 15 8 14

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 16 12 14 PROFICIENT 37 37 40 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 43 38 41 41 WARNING 9 9 8 8

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 10 7 11 PROFICIENT 44 52 48 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 40 28 36 36 WARNING 10 10 8 13

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 17 11 15 PROFICIENT 38 38 43 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 43 40 40 40 WARNING 11 5 6 14

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 13 11 9 PROFICIENT 53 54 44 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 29 38 36 WARNING 6 4 7 7

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 27 24 19 PROFICIENT 58 38 41 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 25 24 28 WARNING 6 10 11 8

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.