• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 49 52 56 47 PROFICIENT 46 39 42 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 4 7 2 3 FAILING 1 1 1 3

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 61 59 58 49 PROFICIENT 30 33 30 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 7 5 11 14 FAILING 2 2 1 3

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 29 31 30 PROFICIENT 63 53 55 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 15 14 16 FAILING 3 2 1 3

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 28 19 24 12 PROFICIENT 58 67 65 76 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 10 8 9 WARNING 5 4 3 2

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 12 18 14 PROFICIENT 36 38 45 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 35 25 33 WARNING 13 14 11 17

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 6 5 6 PROFICIENT 47 51 50 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 43 35 38 33 WARNING 5 8 7 6

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 15 10 13 PROFICIENT 68 66 66 63 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 16 21 20 WARNING 4 3 3 5

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 22 12 13 PROFICIENT 37 43 37 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 24 32 30 WARNING 13 11 20 18

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 16 7 13 PROFICIENT 64 59 59 56 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 19 26 25 WARNING 5 5 8 6

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 18 9 27 PROFICIENT 43 34 37 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 33 35 25 WARNING 10 15 19 10

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 10 12 10 PROFICIENT 53 42 50 58 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 38 29 26 WARNING 4 10 10 7

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 13 18 30 PROFICIENT 33 35 30 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 32 33 22 WARNING 15 21 18 7

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 8 8 24 PROFICIENT 35 31 25 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 43 51 61 33 WARNING 9 10 7 5

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 8 8 16 PROFICIENT 49 49 46 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 31 37 30 WARNING 14 11 10 7

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 9 15 9 PROFICIENT 31 39 36 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 54 39 43 49 WARNING 7 13 6 9

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 13 12 10 PROFICIENT 53 51 51 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 32 34 36 WARNING 6 4 3 6

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 27 30 26 PROFICIENT 51 41 33 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 23 28 26 WARNING 5 8 9 7

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.