• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 28 25 31 36 PROFICIENT 49 63 58 56 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 9 8 6 FAILING 6 3 2 2

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 36 33 43 45 PROFICIENT 32 37 30 29 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 22 19 20 FAILING 10 7 7 6

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 12 9 15 PROFICIENT 40 46 50 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 40 36 35 29 FAILING 9 6 6 3

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 11 14 11 PROFICIENT 62 68 61 68 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 15 18 12 WARNING 8 6 7 9

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 13 8 11 PROFICIENT 31 35 33 28 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 30 29 34 WARNING 27 23 29 26

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 3 1 2 PROFICIENT 26 37 31 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 53 42 52 48 WARNING 20 18 16 16

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 11 9 7 PROFICIENT 62 58 64 60 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 25 21 27 WARNING 6 6 7 7

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 8 11 7 PROFICIENT 27 27 28 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 41 31 33 WARNING 30 24 29 33

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 13 9 7 PROFICIENT 52 50 53 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 25 28 34 WARNING 8 12 10 15

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 13 11 12 PROFICIENT 28 31 32 26 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 41 31 31 37 WARNING 20 24 26 26

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 18 14 11 PROFICIENT 52 44 47 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 29 29 28 WARNING 9 10 11 12

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 17 23 24 PROFICIENT 35 32 32 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 31 28 22 WARNING 18 20 16 18

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 21 15 13 PROFICIENT 38 37 29 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 31 43 36 WARNING 12 11 13 15

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 8 4 7 PROFICIENT 46 38 41 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 41 37 39 33 WARNING 9 17 16 17

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 8 17 16 PROFICIENT 31 28 33 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 48 44 36 35 WARNING 11 19 13 16

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 12 9 10 PROFICIENT 45 49 41 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 29 41 34 WARNING 10 10 9 11

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 23 34 31 PROFICIENT 48 33 33 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 26 20 21 WARNING 15 18 13 14

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.