• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 32 30 33 PROFICIENT 53 50 60 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 11 7 8 FAILING 3 8 3 7

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 39 35 48 40 PROFICIENT 31 30 30 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 20 14 23 FAILING 8 15 8 3

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 9 9 11 PROFICIENT 39 31 45 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 48 50 39 40 FAILING 8 10 6 10

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 4 4 2 PROFICIENT 56 63 54 56 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 25 25 23 WARNING 13 8 16 19

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 4 1 3 PROFICIENT 17 17 13 13 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 42 37 37 WARNING 44 37 49 47

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 0 0 1 0 PROFICIENT 15 17 17 19 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 54 55 44 48 WARNING 30 29 38 33

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 3 1 1 PROFICIENT 49 42 47 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 42 33 40 WARNING 9 13 18 16

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 3 4 2 PROFICIENT 21 18 15 18 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 36 24 28 WARNING 40 43 58 52

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 3 4 6 PROFICIENT 53 38 52 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 34 29 37 WARNING 8 25 15 19

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 6 3 11 PROFICIENT 40 23 26 23 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 37 40 36 WARNING 24 34 31 30

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 6 7 3 PROFICIENT 41 34 45 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 41 38 26 41 WARNING 15 21 23 23

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 8 7 9 PROFICIENT 18 23 32 22 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 42 33 36 WARNING 41 27 29 34

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 6 1 3 PROFICIENT 19 22 23 24 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 51 48 50 52 WARNING 28 24 26 22

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 5 1 4 PROFICIENT 37 38 32 25 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 42 32 46 47 WARNING 13 26 22 24

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 7 0 8 PROFICIENT 26 29 11 22 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 52 41 56 44 WARNING 15 22 33 27

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 12 3 5 PROFICIENT 50 40 33 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 33 48 45 WARNING 15 16 16 23

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 14 12 15 PROFICIENT 48 23 34 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 33 30 29 WARNING 15 31 24 27

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.