• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 43 48 32 PROFICIENT 69 52 47 58 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 5 3 1 8 FAILING 2 2 4 1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 47 50 46 36 PROFICIENT 37 29 29 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 14 16 22 FAILING 3 7 9 1

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 13 20 18 PROFICIENT 29 25 53 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 63 59 21 34 FAILING 1 3 5 3

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 29 16 21 16 PROFICIENT 54 67 66 68 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 14 13 8 14 WARNING 3 4 4 3

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 9 13 15 PROFICIENT 20 30 39 26 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 39 27 49 WARNING 32 23 20 11

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 0 1 3 PROFICIENT 37 37 49 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 50 48 45 64 WARNING 11 15 4 7

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 7 13 17 PROFICIENT 57 66 57 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 23 23 23 WARNING 7 3 7 5

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 10 11 10 PROFICIENT 30 33 31 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 39 40 28 WARNING 26 18 19 28

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 21 25 27 PROFICIENT 51 52 58 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 23 13 20 WARNING 2 4 4 3

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 39 38 49 38 PROFICIENT 34 31 30 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 26 17 20 WARNING 11 5 4 7

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 30 36 22 13 PROFICIENT 51 34 56 61 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 29 18 20 WARNING 1 1 4 6

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 29 40 33 PROFICIENT 43 39 31 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 30 19 11 WARNING 4 3 9 17

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 40 31 19 PROFICIENT 48 33 35 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 28 30 33 WARNING 2 0 4 8

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 16 13 13 PROFICIENT 37 51 36 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 41 22 45 29 WARNING 7 11 6 8

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 20 19 26 PROFICIENT 39 42 43 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 45 26 33 35 WARNING 8 12 4 8

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 9 11 4 PROFICIENT 51 45 52 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 42 35 39 WARNING 4 5 3 5

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 8 16 18 PROFICIENT 49 35 47 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 45 24 23 WARNING 11 12 13 13

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.