• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• Legacy MCAS Open Response Item Results
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 57 60 64 68 PROFICIENT 37 36 33 28 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 3 3 3 2 FAILING 3 0 1 1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 66 70 70 78 PROFICIENT 24 20 21 15 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 6 9 7 4 FAILING 4 1 2 3

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 30 21 44 PROFICIENT 49 48 52 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 22 25 9 FAILING 3 1 2 3

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 39 38 36 26 PROFICIENT 53 53 54 66 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 7 6 6 5 WARNING 1 3 3 3

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 31 31 36 35 PROFICIENT 27 35 28 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 23 23 22 WARNING 12 10 12 8

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 10 8 9 PROFICIENT 48 56 45 58 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 26 41 27 WARNING 8 8 6 6

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 30 30 29 23 PROFICIENT 60 57 61 64 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 7 11 8 11 WARNING 3 3 2 3

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 29 34 39 35 PROFICIENT 37 33 34 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 25 19 18 WARNING 9 7 9 11

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 40 37 28 32 PROFICIENT 44 49 56 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 11 13 9 WARNING 4 4 3 3

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 38 40 42 45 PROFICIENT 33 39 40 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 15 12 15 WARNING 9 5 6 8

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 31 22 26 28 PROFICIENT 53 45 58 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 28 12 19 WARNING 3 5 4 3

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 26 26 35 39 PROFICIENT 40 37 37 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 27 23 20 WARNING 9 10 5 7

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 32 31 32 PROFICIENT 48 34 39 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 28 27 25 WARNING 5 6 4 5

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 20 16 17 PROFICIENT 53 52 49 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 23 28 29 WARNING 4 5 6 7

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 22 32 27 PROFICIENT 44 45 39 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 29 24 30 WARNING 6 4 4 7

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 26 18 15 PROFICIENT 61 49 57 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 21 21 25 WARNING 3 4 4 6

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 38 35 36 PROFICIENT 59 37 42 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 18 17 16 WARNING 2 7 6 5

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.