• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 26 35 28 34 PROFICIENT 68 60 64 55 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 5 4 6 8 FAILING 0 1 2 2

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 57 45 60 51 PROFICIENT 27 41 14 28 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 12 18 12 FAILING 1 3 8 9

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 44 27 26 30 PROFICIENT 44 50 54 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 20 17 19 FAILING 2 3 3 2

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 8 8 6 PROFICIENT 72 72 65 68 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 8 21 13 WARNING 4 12 6 13

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 14 25 17 PROFICIENT 43 39 33 29 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 33 25 33 WARNING 23 14 17 20

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 0 2 2 3 PROFICIENT 28 32 41 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 54 46 41 43 WARNING 18 19 16 22

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 4 2 3 PROFICIENT 60 66 59 65 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 23 23 25 WARNING 8 6 16 7

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 19 16 11 PROFICIENT 25 24 32 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 43 44 33 33 WARNING 17 13 19 25

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 24 7 19 PROFICIENT 60 49 58 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 14 14 24 23 WARNING 7 14 12 4

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 24 12 24 PROFICIENT 30 31 27 29 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 26 42 36 WARNING 16 19 19 11

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 17 28 15 PROFICIENT 64 44 45 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 30 24 31 WARNING 10 9 2 7

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 16 39 34 PROFICIENT 38 38 31 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 32 24 28 WARNING 16 14 7 9

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 16 19 21 PROFICIENT 45 31 32 24 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 43 43 44 WARNING 12 10 6 11

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 15 8 18 PROFICIENT 41 49 48 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 44 34 27 31 WARNING 8 2 17 7

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 18 18 18 PROFICIENT 23 31 41 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 57 46 28 28 WARNING 13 4 14 10

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 21 23 13 PROFICIENT 68 46 56 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 29 20 34 WARNING 3 4 1 4

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 33 53 41 PROFICIENT 61 36 31 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 21 13 17 WARNING 4 10 3 4

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.