Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Whitman Hanson Regional

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Whitman Hanson Regional

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Whitman-Hanson (07800000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Whitman Hanson Regional (07800505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-24-
Mathematics achievement14-34-
Science achievement34-34-
Achievement total81247.581267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth24-04-
Growth total5822.52822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate34----
High school completion total101220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-44-
Advanced coursework completion04----
Additional indicators total2810.04410.0
Weighted total7.110.7-6.310.3-
Percentage of possible points 66%-61%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage64%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement34-
Achievement total81247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth14-
Growth total3822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44-
Extended engagement rate04-
Annual dropout rate04-
High school completion total41220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism14-
Advanced coursework completion24-
Additional indicators total3810.0
Weighted total5.610.7-
Percentage of possible points 52%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage52%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 38

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.8 97.8 0.0 99.2 2684Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 92.4 92.5 0.1 94.2 632Improved Below Target
High needs 93.0 91.4 -1.6 95.0 701No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 94.2 94.2 0.0 96.6 431No Change
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 86.1 85.1 -1.0 88.6 371No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 97.9 98.1 0.2 99.2 2394Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 91.2 91.0 -0.2 92.9 2711No Change
Lowest Performing 66.8 69.5 2.7 69.6 643Met Target
High needs 76.8 80.6 3.8 78.9 714Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 78.7 84.7 6.0 81.8 444Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 63.5 68.9 5.4 66.5 374Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 91.3 91.4 0.1 92.9 2422Improved Below Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.2 95.3 1.1 95.9 2573Met Target
Lowest Performing 80.0 83.2 3.2 84.3 643Met Target
High needs 86.6 88.5 1.9 89.4 613Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 89.2 91.9 2.7 92.1 373Met Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 78.8 81.3 2.5 81.8 323Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 94.0 95.3 1.3 95.8 2343Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 52.4 50.0 2503Met Target
Lowest Performing 41.2 50.0 602Below Target
High needs 45.2 50.0 612Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 47.7 50.0 402Below Target
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities 34.7 50.0 321Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 7--
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 2--
White 52.3 50.0 2253Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 45.5 50.0 2522Below Target
Lowest Performing 28.1 50.0 600Below Target
High needs 37.4 50.0 621Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 38.3 50.0 411Below Target
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities 30.0 50.0 321Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 7--
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 2--
White 45.8 50.0 2272Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 93.8 96.9 3.1 96.1 2904Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 85.7 92.7 7.0 89.8 1104Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 89.3 93.3 4.0 94.4 902Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 73.3 87.8 14.5 79.8 414Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.4 97.4 4.0 95.5 2734Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.9 97.1 -1.8 100.0 3073Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 98.2 92.9 -5.3 100.0 1260Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 97.8 96.1 -1.7 100.0 1033Met Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 97.6 86.7 -10.9 100.0 450Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.8 96.9 -1.9 100.0 2903Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.3 0.4 -0.1 1.0 1,1583Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.7 1.4 -0.7 1.0 2920Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 2.0 -2.0 1.0 1970Declined
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 1.4 0.7 0.7 1.3 1424Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 22--
Hispanic/Latino---- 28--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 25--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 0.3 0.5 -0.2 1.0 1,0643Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 18.7 18.5 0.2 17.6 1,1822Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 27.1 17.2 9.9 20.5 644Exceeded Target
High needs 33.2 33.2 0.0 30.8 3371No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 33.8 38.6 -4.8 29.2 1890Declined
EL and Former EL---- 17--
Students w/ disabilities 34.7 32.1 2.6 31.6 1593Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 4--
Asian---- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 29--
Hispanic/Latino---- 37--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 29--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 18.4 18.0 0.4 17.2 1,0652Improved Below Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 67.6 65.0 -2.6 73.3 6020Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 28.3 31.1 2.8 36.8 1642Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 36.5 34.2 -2.3 46.9 1200Declined
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 16.7 16.2 -0.5 24.0 741No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 69.3 65.9 -3.4 74.6 5480Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 276 27198Yes 1 276 27499Yes 1 275 275100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 73 7197Yes 1 73 7299Yes 1 72 72100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 45 4396Yes 1 45 4498Yes 1 45 45100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 4---- 4---- 3----
Students w/ disabilities 37 37100Yes 1 37 37100Yes 1 37 37100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 7---- 7---- 7----
Afr. Amer./Black 7---- 7---- 7----
Hispanic/Latino 10---- 10---- 9----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 4---- 4---- 4----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 2---- 2---- 2----
White 246 24198Yes 1 246 24499Yes 1 246 246100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles