Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Joseph C Chamberlain

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Joseph C Chamberlain

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Taunton (02930000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Joseph C Chamberlain (02930008)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
67% - Partially meeting targets53

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-24-
Mathematics achievement34-44-
Science achievement------
Achievement total5867.56867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-14-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total5822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total2410.04410.0
Weighted total4.77.6-5.47.6-
Percentage of possible points 62%-71%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage67%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement---
Achievement total5867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total4.57.6-
Percentage of possible points 59%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage59%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 42

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 501.0 501.2 0.2 502.5 2092Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 480.2 482.7 2.5 484.9 282Improved Below Target
High needs 490.9 491.2 0.3 492.5 902Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 492.2 492.7 0.5 493.6 682Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 482.9 484.7 1.8 484.6 463Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 15--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 502.4 502.4 0.0 504.0 1721No Change

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 499.4 500.3 0.9 500.8 2083Met Target
Lowest Performing 476.1 482.7 6.6 479.7 284Exceeded Target
High needs 487.4 488.8 1.4 489.1 893Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 490.3 489.6 -0.7 491.4 680Declined
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 478.0 480.0 2.0 480.1 453Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 15--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 501.8 501.6 -0.2 503.3 1711No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 47.8 50.0 1172Below Target
Lowest Performing 39.0 50.0 281Below Target
High needs 43.3 50.0 472Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 44.6 50.0 352Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 43.4 50.0 202Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 49.5 50.0 1032Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 58.6 50.0 1163Met Target
Lowest Performing 58.7 50.0 283Met Target
High needs 58.0 50.0 463Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 58.1 50.0 353Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 6--
Students w/ disabilities-- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 58.8 50.0 1023Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.8 5.5 0.3 4.7 4402Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 284Exceeded Target
High needs 8.2 9.3 -1.1 5.8 2050Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.3 10.7 -0.4 6.8 1491No Change
EL and Former EL---- 23--
Students w/ disabilities 7.3 7.3 0.0 4.0 961No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 45--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 5.4 5.7 -0.3 4.1 3481No Change

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 217 216100Yes 1 216 215100Yes 1 0----
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 96 9599Yes 1 95 9499Yes 1 0----
Econ. Disadvantaged 73 7299Yes 1 73 7299Yes 1 0----
EL and Former EL 9---- 9---- 0----
Students w/ disabilities 49 49100Yes 1 48 48100Yes 1 0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Asian 3---- 3---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 18---- 18---- 0----
Hispanic/Latino 12---- 12---- 0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 7---- 7---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 176 17599Yes 1 175 17499Yes 1 0----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles