Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Pembroke High School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Pembroke High School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Pembroke (02310000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Pembroke High School (02310505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-14-
Mathematics achievement34-44-
Science achievement14-34-
Achievement total81247.581267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth24-14-
Growth total5822.53822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate34----
High school completion total61220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-44-
Advanced coursework completion34----
Additional indicators total3810.04410.0
Weighted total6.410.7-6.510.3-
Percentage of possible points 60%-63%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage62%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement14-
Achievement total11247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04-
Extended engagement rate04-
Annual dropout rate04-
High school completion total01220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion24-
Additional indicators total4810.0
Weighted total1.810.7-
Percentage of possible points 17%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage17%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 26

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.3 98.7 -0.6 100.0 1924Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 96.9 95.3 -1.6 98.7 481No Change
High needs 98.1 90.0 -8.1 100.0 250Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 99.3 98.6 -0.7 100.0 1844Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 93.4 95.0 1.6 95.1 1913Met Target
Lowest Performing 72.3 81.3 9.0 75.1 484Exceeded Target
High needs 79.8 77.1 -2.7 81.9 240Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 93.9 94.8 0.9 95.5 1833Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 96.1 95.9 -0.2 97.8 1881No Change
Lowest Performing 84.6 89.1 4.5 88.9 483Met Target
High needs 87.8 87.0 -0.8 90.6 251No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 96.0 95.7 -0.3 97.8 1801No Change

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.5 50.0 1793Met Target
Lowest Performing 43.1 50.0 412Below Target
High needs 46.2 50.0 222Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 14--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 50.7 50.0 1713Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 47.2 50.0 1802Below Target
Lowest Performing 38.0 50.0 421Below Target
High needs 43.4 50.0 212Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 14--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 47.1 50.0 1722Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 96.2 91.7 -4.5 98.5 2400Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 94.9 79.0 -15.9 99.0 810Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 65--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 36--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 0--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 96.1 91.5 -4.6 98.2 2350Declined

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 96.8 96.2 -0.6 98.5 2363Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 96.4 94.9 -1.5 100.0 790Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 60--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 32--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.7 96.1 -0.6 98.5 2303Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.9 0.9 0.0 1.0 9673Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 2.5 3.3 -0.8 2.3 1800Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 102--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 94--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 4--
White 0.8 1.0 -0.2 1.0 9383Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 37.4 38.7 -1.3 36.3 9210Declined
Lowest Performing 66.7 41.7 25.0 60.1 484Exceeded Target
High needs 59.5 59.1 0.4 57.1 1712Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 73--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 90--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 3--
White 37.5 39.0 -1.5 36.3 8890Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 69.5 75.2 5.7 75.2 5043Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 45.2 46.7 1.5 53.7 922Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 51--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 48--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 69.2 75.7 6.5 74.5 4894Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 192 192100Yes 1 191 191100Yes 1 192 192100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 25 25100Yes 1 24 24100Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 16---- 16---- 16----
EL and Former EL---------------
Students w/ disabilities 12---- 11---- 12----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 4---- 4---- 4----
Afr. Amer./Black 2---- 2---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino---------------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 1---- 1---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 1----
White 184 184100Yes 1 183 183100Yes 1 184 184100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles