Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Hingham High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Hingham High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Hingham (01310000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Hingham High (01310505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement14-04-
Science achievement34-04-
Achievement total81247.541267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth44-34-
Growth total7822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34----
Extended engagement rate44----
Annual dropout rate44----
High school completion total111220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-34-
Advanced coursework completion44----
Additional indicators total7810.03410.0
Weighted total8.310.7-4.110.3-
Percentage of possible points 78%-40%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage59%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total11247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04-
Extended engagement rate44-
Annual dropout rate34-
High school completion total71220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion44-
Additional indicators total4810.0
Weighted total3.610.7-
Percentage of possible points 34%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage34%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 84

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.9 99.4 -0.5 100.0 3084Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 99.6 98.0 -1.6 100.0 764Exceeded Target
High needs 99.4 97.1 -2.3 100.0 511No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 99.1 96.1 -3.0 100.0 380Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.9 99.5 -0.4 100.0 2764Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.4 96.3 -2.1 99.9 3071No Change
Lowest Performing 93.8 85.9 -7.9 95.8 760Declined
High needs 90.7 81.4 -9.3 92.9 510Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 86.7 77.6 -9.1 89.7 380Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.5 96.5 -2.0 100.0 2751No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.7 97.1 -1.6 100.0 3013Met Target
Lowest Performing 95.8 88.8 -7.0 97.9 760Declined
High needs 92.1 85.3 -6.8 94.4 510Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 88.8 80.9 -7.9 91.1 380Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.6 97.0 -1.6 100.0 2703Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 58.7 50.0 2913Met Target
Lowest Performing 43.9 50.0 732Below Target
High needs 59.9 50.0 483Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 16--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 57.4 50.0 353Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 58.7 50.0 2623Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 65.9 50.0 2914Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 50.1 50.0 723Met Target
High needs 58.1 50.0 473Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 16--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 58.0 50.0 343Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 65.9 50.0 2624Exceeded Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 99.3 97.0 -2.3 100.0 2983Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 100.0 87.8 -12.2 100.0 740Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 39--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 100.0 87.8 -12.2 100.0 490Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.6 97.4 -2.2 100.0 2743Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.9 99.6 0.7 99.9 2714Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 96.5 100.0 3.5 99.3 704Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 33--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 97.7 100.0 2.3 100.0 504Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.9 100.0 1.1 100.0 2504Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.3 0.1 0.2 1.0 1,2244Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.4 0.5 -0.1 1.0 2003Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 78--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 0.6 0.7 -0.1 1.0 1363Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 26--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 34--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 34--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.4 0.1 0.3 1.0 1,1194Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.4 7.0 -0.6 5.4 1,2573Met Target
Lowest Performing 4.2 7.9 -3.7 0.0 763Met Target
High needs 18.1 21.4 -3.3 15.4 1680Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 66--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 12.8 18.2 -5.4 8.9 990Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 34--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 16--
Hispanic/Latino---- 34--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 26--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 6.2 6.3 -0.1 4.9 1,1474Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 84.0 98.2 14.2 87.2 6104Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 33.7 63.3 29.6 41.7 794Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 33--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 19.7 44.2 24.5 27.2 524Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 17--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 84.8 98.6 13.8 87.8 5594Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 316 31399Yes 1 317 31399Yes 1 316 315100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 56 5496Yes 1 56 5496Yes 1 55 5498Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 18---- 18---- 18----
EL and Former EL 3---- 3---- 2----
Students w/ disabilities 41 4098Yes 1 41 4098Yes 1 41 4098Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 11---- 11---- 10----
Afr. Amer./Black 1---- 1---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 14---- 14---- 14----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 9---- 9---- 9----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 281 27999Yes 1 282 27999Yes 1 282 281100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles