Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Franklin High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Franklin High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Franklin (01010000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Franklin High (01010505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement24-14-
Science achievement44-34-
Achievement total101247.581267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth24-14-
Growth total5822.53822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate34----
High school completion total91220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion44----
Additional indicators total4810.00410.0
Weighted total8.110.7-6.110.3-
Percentage of possible points 76%-59%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage68%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement34-
Achievement total111247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34-
Extended engagement rate04-
Annual dropout rate04-
High school completion total31220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion44-
Additional indicators total4810.0
Weighted total7.410.7-
Percentage of possible points 69%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage69%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 82

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.7 99.7 1.0 100.0 4344Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 98.1 99.1 1.0 99.9 1064Exceeded Target
High needs 92.8 99.4 6.6 94.8 874Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 94.0 99.2 5.2 96.4 304Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 90.4 99.2 8.8 92.9 634Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 99.0 100.0 1.0 100.0 204Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 98.9 99.7 0.8 100.0 3814Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.5 95.7 0.2 97.2 4332Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 87.0 85.8 -1.2 89.8 1061No Change
High needs 79.6 85.3 5.7 81.7 874Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 85.3 85.8 0.5 88.4 302Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 75.4 81.7 6.3 78.4 634Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 97.1 98.8 1.7 99.8 204Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 96.2 96.1 -0.1 97.8 3801No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.3 98.2 -0.1 100.0 4184Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 94.3 93.6 -0.7 98.6 1063Met Target
High needs 92.5 93.8 1.3 95.3 813Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 94.4 97.1 2.7 97.3 263Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 90.9 91.8 0.9 93.9 613Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 19--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 98.3 98.3 0.0 100.0 3724Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 56.8 50.0 4113Met Target
Lowest Performing 49.2 50.0 1012Below Target
High needs 54.8 50.0 743Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 49.7 50.0 252Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 57.4 50.0 543Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 18--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino-- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 1--
White 57.3 50.0 3653Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.9 50.0 4062Below Target
Lowest Performing 34.4 50.0 1001Below Target
High needs 45.7 50.0 732Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 33.8 50.0 251Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 49.4 50.0 522Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 18--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino-- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 2--
White 46.0 50.0 3592Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 96.2 96.8 0.6 98.5 4033Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 85.0 89.0 4.0 89.1 1003Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 77.4 88.3 10.9 82.5 604Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 80.0 83.0 3.0 86.5 532Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 15--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.0 96.7 -0.3 99.1 3593Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.2 98.3 0.1 99.9 4173Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 95.7 93.0 -2.7 99.7 1000Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 94.9 88.7 -6.2 99.2 530Declined
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 93.1 90.8 -2.3 97.9 650Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 22--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.4 98.9 0.5 100.0 3723Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.3 0.4 -0.1 1.0 1,7343Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 2.0 2.4 -0.4 1.8 2970Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.6 4.0 -1.4 2.3 990Declined
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 2.4 2.3 0.1 2.2 2161No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 784Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 29--
Hispanic/Latino---- 37--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 34--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 4--
White 0.3 0.3 0.0 1.0 1,5493Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 9.5 10.3 -0.8 8.4 1,7910Declined
Lowest Performing 5.7 11.3 -5.6 0.0 1060Declined
High needs 20.3 20.9 -0.6 17.9 3590Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 27.9 35.8 -7.9 23.3 1200Declined
EL and Former EL---- 20--
Students w/ disabilities 17.9 16.7 1.2 14.8 2522Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 4--
Asian 5.1 6.1 -1.0 2.3 994Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 32--
Hispanic/Latino---- 37--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 36--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 4--
White 9.4 9.9 -0.5 8.2 1,5791No Change

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.0 98.9 1.9 100.0 8904Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 96.4 100.0 3.6 100.0 1424Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 100.0 89.8 -10.2 100.0 593Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 94.7 100.0 5.3 100.0 984Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian 100.0 97.7 -2.3 100.0 444Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 15--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 97.3 98.9 1.6 100.0 7984Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 438 438100Yes 1 438 437100Yes 1 439 439100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 88 88100Yes 1 87 87100Yes 1 88 88100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 31 31100Yes 1 30 30100Yes 1 31 31100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 6---- 6---- 6----
Students w/ disabilities 63 63100Yes 1 63 63100Yes 1 63 63100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1
Afr. Amer./Black 9---- 8---- 9----
Hispanic/Latino 9---- 9---- 9----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 14---- 14---- 14----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 2---- 2---- 2----
White 384 384100Yes 1 385 384100Yes 1 385 385100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles