Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Norfolk County Agricultural

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Norfolk County Agricultural

Organization Information
District:Norfolk County Agricultural (09150000)School type:High School
School:Norfolk County Agricultural (09150705)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 99.5, Target = 99.3CPI = 99.5, Target = 99.3 98.8 99.6 99.5 -0.1 99.3 99.4 84137100Above Target
High needsCPI = 98.4, Target = 98.4CPI = 98.4, Target = 98.4 97.3 98.8 98.4 -0.4 98.4 98.7 8848100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities  90.0---- 95.0-28--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 99.4, Target = 99.3CPI = 99.4, Target = 99.3 98.8 99.6 99.4 -0.2 99.3 99.4 69117100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.6, Target = 96.9CPI = 95.6, Target = 96.9CPI = 95.6, Target = 96.9 94.7 95.5 95.6 0.1 96.9 97.4 7213650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 92, Target = 93.5CPI = 92, Target = 93.5CPI = 92, Target = 93.5 88.9 89.9 92.0 2.1 93.5 94.5 884750Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities  91.3---- 95.7-27--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.9, Target = 97.1CPI = 95.9, Target = 97.1CPI = 95.9, Target = 97.1 95.0 95.5 95.9 0.4 97.1 97.5 6411775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.9, Target = 97.9CPI = 97.9, Target = 97.9 96.4 98.7 97.9 -0.8 97.9 98.2 90131100Above Target
High needsCPI = 96.2, Target = 94.9CPI = 96.2, Target = 94.9CPI = 96.2, Target = 94.9 91.3 97.3 96.2 -1.1 94.9 95.7 9846100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------27--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 98.7, Target = 97.8CPI = 98.7, Target = 97.8 96.3 98.7 98.7 0.0 97.8 98.2 93112100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 50.0 29.21370 0.0 0.013725
High needs 35.7 12.5480 0.0 0.04825
Econ. Disadvantaged--22---22-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--28---28-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 50.8 29.91170 0.0 0.011725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 49.2 44.91360 0.8 0.713625
High needs 23.8 31.94725 2.4 2.14725
Econ. Disadvantaged--22---22-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--27---27-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 50.0 42.71170 0.8 0.91170
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 44.1 31.31310 0.0 0.013125
High needs 32.4 21.7460 0.0 0.04625
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--27---27-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 44.6 33.01120 0.0 0.011225
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 30.5, Target = 51SGP = 30.5, Target = 51SGP = 30.5, Target = 51 39.0 30.5 -8.5 51.0No12425Below Target
High needsSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 45.0 36.0 -9.0 51.0No4325Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 29.5, Target = 51SGP = 29.5, Target = 51SGP = 29.5, Target = 51 41.0 29.5 -11.5 51.0No1040Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51 35.0 33.5 -1.5 51.0No12225Below Target
High needsSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 41.0 32.0 -9.0 51.0Yes4275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51 36.0 35.0 -1.0 51.0No10325Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 97.1, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.1, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.1, Target = 80 95.7 97.1 1.4 80.0 90.0104100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 92.1, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.1, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.1, Target = 80 94.1 92.1 -2.0 80.0 90.03875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.021--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.02--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.02--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 97, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 97, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 97, Target = 80 96.5 97.0 0.5 80.0 90.099100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 85 100.0 100.0 0.0 85.0 95.0116100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 85 100.0 100.0 0.0 85.0 95.034100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.018--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.02--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 85 100.0 100.0 0.0 85.0 95.0113100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0, Target = 0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.095498100Above Target
High needsDropout Rate = 0, Target = 0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.091129100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------59--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesDropout Rate = 0, Target = 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.08878--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0, Target = 0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.092462100Above Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students137137100Yes13713699Yes137137100Yes
High needs4848100Yes484798Yes4848100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged22---22---22---
EL and Former EL2---2---2---
Students w/ disabilities2828100Yes282796Yes2828100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian3---3---3---
Afr. Amer./Black4---4---4---
Hispanic/Latino7---7---7---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5---5---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White117117100Yes117117100Yes117117100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles