Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Bristol County Agricultural High
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Bristol County Agricultural High
Organization Information
District:Bristol County Agricultural (09100000)School type:High School
School:Bristol County Agricultural High (09100705)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 99, Target = 98CPI = 99, Target = 98 96.5 99.1 99.0 -0.1 98.0 98.3 68120100Above Target
High needsCPI = 97.9, Target = 96.1CPI = 97.9, Target = 96.1CPI = 97.9, Target = 96.1 93.3 96.9 97.9 1.0 96.1 96.7 8235100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 98.9, Target = 98.3CPI = 98.9, Target = 98.3 97.1 99.3 98.9 -0.4 98.3 98.6 56116100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91, Target = 98.3CPI = 91, Target = 98.3CPI = 91, Target = 98.3 97.0 93.8 91.0 -2.8 98.3 98.5 421200Declined
High needsCPI = 75.7, Target = 97.1CPI = 75.7, Target = 97.1CPI = 75.7, Target = 97.1 95.0 83.3 75.7 -7.6 97.1 97.5 21350Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.4, Target = 98.4CPI = 91.4, Target = 98.4CPI = 91.4, Target = 98.4 97.3 94.0 91.4 -2.6 98.4 98.7 291160Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.6, Target = 97.6CPI = 95.6, Target = 97.6CPI = 95.6, Target = 97.6 95.9 95.4 95.6 0.2 97.6 98.0 7311950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 88.2, Target = 96.2CPI = 88.2, Target = 96.2CPI = 88.2, Target = 96.2 93.5 90.9 88.2 -2.7 96.2 96.8 73340Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------21--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.4, Target = 97.9CPI = 95.4, Target = 97.9CPI = 95.4, Target = 97.9 96.4 95.3 95.4 0.1 97.9 98.2 6411550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 43.5 35.01200 0.0 0.012025
High needs 34.4 25.7350 0.0 0.03525
Econ. Disadvantaged--22---22-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 43.9 36.21160 0.0 0.011625
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 50.9 48.31200 3.4 5.01200
High needs 36.4 22.9350 12.1 14.3350
Econ. Disadvantaged--22---22-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 52.8 50.01160 2.8 4.31160
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 28.9 27.71190 0.9 0.011925
High needs 21.2 11.8340 3.0 0.03425
Econ. Disadvantaged--21---21-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 31.1 28.71150 0.9 0.011525
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 34.0 37.0 3.0 51.0No11250Below Target
High needsSGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51 33.0 38.5 5.5 51.0No3450Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 34.0 38.0 4.0 51.0No10850Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 32.0 37.0 5.0 51.0No11250Below Target
High needsSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 30.0 32.0 2.0 51.0No3450Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51 34.0 38.5 4.5 51.0No10850Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 96, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 96, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 96, Target = 80 98.2 96.0 -2.2 80.0 90.0101100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 94.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.4, Target = 80 97.9 94.4 -3.5 80.0 90.03675On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.05--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.02--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.03--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.01--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 80 98.0 95.7 -2.3 80.0 90.094100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 98.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 98.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 98.2, Target = 85 98.1 98.2 0.1 85.0 95.0111100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 97.9, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.9, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.9, Target = 85 100.0 97.9 -2.1 85.0 95.048100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.012--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.01--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.08--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.02--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 98, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 98, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 98, Target = 85 98.0 98.0 0.0 85.0 95.0100100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0.2, Target = 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.18444875On Target
High needsDropout Rate = 0.9, Target = 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.9 -0.2 0.4 0.37210725No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------68--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------47--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.2, Target = 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.17942675On Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students120120100Yes120120100Yes120120100Yes
High needs3535100Yes3535100Yes3535100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged22---22---22---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities18---18---18---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino2---2---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White116116100Yes116116100Yes116116100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles