Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Charles McCann Vocational Technical

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Charles McCann Vocational Technical

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 99.1, Target = 97.3 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 99.1, Target = 97.3CPI = 99.1, Target = 97.375 or Higher All Students 95.3 97.7 99.1 1.4 97.3 97.7 70116100Above Target
High needsCPI = 97.7, Target = 95.9 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 97.7, Target = 95.9CPI = 97.7, Target = 95.975 or Higher High needs 92.9 95.1 97.7 2.6 95.9 96.5 7843100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 96.9, Target = 96.2 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 96.9, Target = 96.275 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 95.8 95.8 96.9 1.1 96.2 97.9 653275On Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 99.1, Target = 97.4 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 99.1, Target = 97.4CPI = 99.1, Target = 97.475 or Higher White 95.5 98.1 99.1 1.0 97.4 97.8 60110100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.9, Target = 94.9 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 92.9, Target = 94.9 75 or Higher All Students 91.2 92.5 92.9 0.4 94.9 95.6 5411650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 88.1, Target = 93.5 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 88.1, Target = 93.5 75 or Higher High needs 88.8 90.0 88.1 -1.9 93.5 94.4 734425No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 87.1, Target = 90.3 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 87.1, Target = 90.3 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 89.4 89.4 87.1 -2.3 90.3 94.7 633325No Change
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.2, Target = 95.2 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 93.2, Target = 95.2 75 or Higher White 91.7 93.0 93.2 0.2 95.2 95.9 4511050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.6, Target = 93.8 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 94.6, Target = 93.875 or Higher All Students 89.3 91.4 94.6 3.2 93.8 94.7 6710775On Target
High needsCPI = 87.8, Target = 92 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 87.8, Target = 92 75 or Higher High needs 86.2 90.6 87.8 -2.8 92.0 93.1 70370Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 89.8, Target = 92.8 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 89.8, Target = 92.8 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 92.1 92.1 89.8 -2.3 92.8 96.1 742725No Change
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.4, Target = 94.1 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 94.4, Target = 94.175 or Higher White 89.9 91.8 94.4 2.6 94.1 95.0 5410375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 25.8 25.91160 0.8 0.011625
High needs 23.0 11.6430 1.6 0.04325
Econ. Disadvantaged 26.4 12.5320 0.0 0.03225
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--19---19-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 26.7 25.51100 0.8 0.011025
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 32.3 34.51160 2.3 2.61160
High needs 26.7 25.0440 5.0 6.8440
Econ. Disadvantaged 30.8 27.3330 5.8 9.1330
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--20---20-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 33.9 35.51100 1.7 2.71100
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 11.2 25.210725 1.7 2.81070
High needs 12.5 16.23725 2.1 8.1370
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.6 14.8270 2.4 11.1270
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.1 25.210325 1.9 2.91030
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 43, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 43, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 36.0 43.0 7.0 51.0Yes8875On Target
High needsSGP = 42, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 42, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 31.0 42.0 11.0 51.0Yes3575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 36, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 36, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 24.0 36.0 12.0 51.0Yes2775On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 42, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 42, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 36.0 42.0 6.0 51.0Yes8575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 52, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 52.0 52.0 0.0 51.0No8975On Target
High needsSGP = 48.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 48.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 55.0 48.5 -6.5 51.0No3650Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 48, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 51.0 48.0 -3.0 51.0No2850Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 53.5, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 5175 or Higher White 52.5 53.5 1.0 51.0No8675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 80 - All StudentsAll Students-Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 8075 or Higher All Students 93.5 95.7 2.2 80.0 90.0117100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 92.6, Target = 80 - High needsHigh needs-Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.6, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.6, Target = 8075 or Higher High needs 87.9 92.6 4.7 80.0 90.06875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.021--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.01--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.04--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 96.4, Target = 80 - WhiteWhite-Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.4, Target = 8075 or Higher White 93.3 96.4 3.1 80.0 90.0111100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 96.3, Target = 85 - All StudentsAll Students-Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.3, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.3, Target = 8575 or Higher All Students 95.0 96.3 1.3 85.0 95.0107100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 93.1, Target = 85 - High needsHigh needs-Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.1, Target = 8575 or Higher High needs 90.6 93.1 2.5 85.0 95.05875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.019--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.01--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.01--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 96.2, Target = 85 - WhiteWhite-Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.2, Target = 8575 or Higher White 94.8 96.2 1.4 85.0 95.0104100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0.6, Target = 0.4Dropout Rate 75 or Higher All Students 0.6 1.6 0.6 1.0 0.4 0.36650050Improved Below Target
High needsDropout Rate = 0, Target = 0.5Dropout Rate 75 or Higher High needs 0.8 3.5 0.0 3.5 0.5 0.491179100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged  0.0---- 0.0-133--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------75--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.6, Target = 0.4Dropout Rate 75 or Higher White 0.6 1.7 0.6 1.1 0.4 0.35647350Improved Below Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students11711699Yes116116100Yes11611599Yes
High needs444398Yes4444100Yes444398Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged333297Yes3333100Yes333297Yes
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities20---20---20---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino2---2---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White11111099Yes110110100Yes11010999Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles