Massachusetts School and District Profiles

McCarthy-Towne School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - McCarthy-Towne School
Organization Information
District:Acton-Boxborough (06000000)School type:Elementary School
School:McCarthy-Towne School (06000015)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.7, Target = 94.9CPI = 90.7, Target = 94.9CPI = 90.7, Target = 94.9 91.2 90.0 90.7 0.7 94.9 95.6 7327250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 77.7, Target = 86.6CPI = 77.7, Target = 86.6CPI = 77.7, Target = 86.6 77.1 72.6 77.7 5.1 86.6 88.6 608350Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------21--
EL and Former EL -------23--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 73.1, Target = 85.2CPI = 73.1, Target = 85.2CPI = 73.1, Target = 85.2 74.6 69.3 73.1 3.8 85.2 87.3 735350Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 91.4, Target = 98.7CPI = 91.4, Target = 98.7CPI = 91.4, Target = 98.7 97.7 91.9 91.4 -0.5 98.7 98.9 413525No Change
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92, Target = 94.8CPI = 92, Target = 94.8CPI = 92, Target = 94.8 91.1 90.0 92.0 2.0 94.8 95.6 7219850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.5, Target = 93.2CPI = 90.5, Target = 93.2CPI = 90.5, Target = 93.2 88.3 90.2 90.5 0.3 93.2 94.2 7327250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 77.1, Target = 82.7CPI = 77.1, Target = 82.7CPI = 77.1, Target = 82.7 70.4 75.0 77.1 2.1 82.7 85.2 558450Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------21--
EL and Former EL -------24--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 73.1, Target = 81CPI = 73.1, Target = 81CPI = 73.1, Target = 81 67.4 71.9 73.1 1.2 81.0 83.7 735450Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 96.4, Target = 98.7CPI = 96.4, Target = 98.7CPI = 96.4, Target = 98.7 97.7 95.6 96.4 0.8 98.7 98.9 5335100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91, Target = 93CPI = 91, Target = 93CPI = 91, Target = 93 88.0 90.9 91.0 0.1 93.0 94.0 6919850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86, Target = 91.7CPI = 86, Target = 91.7CPI = 86, Target = 91.7 85.8 86.4 86.0 -0.4 91.7 92.9 677325No Change
High needs -------17--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------6--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------12--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.8, Target = 93.5CPI = 86.8, Target = 93.5CPI = 86.8, Target = 93.5 88.9 87.5 86.8 -0.7 93.5 94.5 595525No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.8 15.42720 3.3 4.02720
High needs 6.3 4.8830 12.7 10.88325
Econ. Disadvantaged--21---21-
EL and Former EL--23---23-
Students w/ disabilities 4.2 1.9530 16.7 13.25325
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 26.5 20.0350 2.9 2.9350
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--20---20-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.9 14.61980 3.5 3.019825
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 41.0 39.72720 3.7 4.82720
High needs 15.6 13.1840 14.1 13.1840
Econ. Disadvantaged--21---21-
EL and Former EL--24---24-
Students w/ disabilities 10.2 9.3540 16.3 16.7540
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 55.9 68.63525 0.0 2.9350
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--20---20-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 40.3 36.91980 3.5 4.51980
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 19.1 13.7730 4.4 2.77325
High needs--17---17-
Econ. Disadvantaged--6---6-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--12---12-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.5 16.4550 1.9 1.8550
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 45.0 45.0 0.0 51.0Yes19375On Target
High needsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 47.0 47.0 0.0 51.0Yes5475On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-11--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 45.5 45.0 -0.5 51.0No3750Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-21--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 43.0 46.0 3.0 51.0Yes14475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 59.5 60.0 0.5 51.0No192100Above Target
High needsSGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51 59.0 56.5 -2.5 51.0No5475On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-11--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 62.0 56.0 -6.0 51.0No3775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-21--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 61.5 59.0 -2.5 51.0No14475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 84.0 60.02125
High needs 84.0 60.02125
EL and Former EL- 60.021-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students28528399Yes28528399Yes7474100Yes
High needs929199Yes9292100Yes18---
Econ. Disadvantaged27---27---6---
EL and Former EL31---31---4---
Students w/ disabilities555498Yes5555100Yes12---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian3737100Yes3737100Yes12---
Afr. Amer./Black6---6-------
Hispanic/Latino27---27---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.14---14---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White200200100Yes200200100Yes5555100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles