Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Midland Street
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Midland Street
Organization Information
District:Worcester (03480000)School type:Elementary School
School:Midland Street (03480185)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.5, Target = 88.7CPI = 88.5, Target = 88.7 80.6 86.6 88.5 1.9 88.7 90.3 6411775On Target
High needsCPI = 80.6, Target = 81CPI = 80.6, Target = 81 67.4 79.7 80.6 0.9 81.0 83.7 725875On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 82, Target = 84.4CPI = 82, Target = 84.4CPI = 82, Target = 84.4 83.0 83.0 82.0 -1.0 84.4 91.5 753225No Change
EL and Former ELCPI = 89.6, Target = 75.9CPI = 89.6, Target = 75.9CPI = 89.6, Target = 75.9 58.7 83.3 89.6 6.3 75.9 79.4 9424100Above Target
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------13--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.1, Target = 92.4CPI = 93.1, Target = 92.4 86.9 91.0 93.1 2.1 92.4 93.5 807275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.1, Target = 89.7CPI = 83.1, Target = 89.7CPI = 83.1, Target = 89.7 82.4 77.8 83.1 5.3 89.7 91.2 3911750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 73.3, Target = 83.3CPI = 73.3, Target = 83.3CPI = 73.3, Target = 83.3 71.4 72.3 73.3 1.0 83.3 85.7 395850Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 72.7, Target = 79.2CPI = 72.7, Target = 79.2CPI = 72.7, Target = 79.2 77.3 77.3 72.7 -4.6 79.2 88.7 34320Declined
EL and Former ELCPI = 86.5, Target = 82.3CPI = 86.5, Target = 82.3CPI = 86.5, Target = 82.3 69.6 78.5 86.5 8.0 82.3 84.8 8324100Above Target
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------13--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.6, Target = 92.8CPI = 89.6, Target = 92.8CPI = 89.6, Target = 92.8 87.7 84.6 89.6 5.0 92.8 93.9 607250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.7, Target = 77.9CPI = 78.7, Target = 77.9 62.1 88.5 78.7 -9.8 77.9 81.1 433475On Target
High needs -------14--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------6--
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilities -------4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------14--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 13.2 17.911725 4.4 8.51170
High needs 5.4 3.4580 8.1 17.2580
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.8 6.3320 4.5 15.6320
EL and Former EL 5.6 0.0240 5.6 4.22425
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--13---13-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--19---19-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.8 25.07225 1.2 4.2720
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 29.4 32.511725 15.4 7.711725
High needs 24.3 17.2580 20.3 12.15825
Econ. Disadvantaged 27.3 21.9320 18.2 9.43225
EL and Former EL 25.0 20.8240 8.3 0.02425
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--13---13-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--19---19-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 36.0 37.5720 8.1 4.27225
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 26.9 26.5340 0.0 11.8340
High needs--14---14-
Econ. Disadvantaged--6---6-
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities--4---4-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--14---14-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 47.0 67.0 20.0 51.0Yes93100Above Target
High needsSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 49.5 57.0 7.5 51.0Yes4675On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 73, Target = 51SGP = 73, Target = 51SGP = 73, Target = 51 48.0 73.0 25.0 51.0Yes27100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-19--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-12--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 69.5, Target = 51SGP = 69.5, Target = 51SGP = 69.5, Target = 51 48.5 69.5 21.0 51.0Yes56100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 68.5 65.0 -3.5 51.0Yes93100Above Target
High needsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 66.0 51.0 -15.0 51.0No4675On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 67.5 48.0 -19.5 51.0No2750Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-19--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-12--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51 69.5 65.5 -4.0 51.0Yes56100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 88.5 60.03225
High needs 88.5 60.03225
EL and Former EL 88.5 60.03225
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students124124100Yes124124100Yes3535100Yes
High needs6464100Yes6464100Yes14---
Econ. Disadvantaged3838100Yes3838100Yes6---
EL and Former EL2727100Yes2727100Yes10---
Students w/ disabilities16---16---4---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian13---13---8---
Afr. Amer./Black6---6-------
Hispanic/Latino20---20---7---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.9---9---5---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White7676100Yes7676100Yes15---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles