Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Wawecus Road School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Wawecus Road School
Organization Information
District:Worcester (03480000)School type:Elementary School
School:Wawecus Road School (03480026)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 74.1, Target = 86CPI = 74.1, Target = 86CPI = 74.1, Target = 86 76.0 76.5 74.1 -2.4 86.0 88.0 148625No Change
High needsCPI = 73.9, Target = 85.4CPI = 73.9, Target = 85.4CPI = 73.9, Target = 85.4 75.0 74.2 73.9 -0.3 85.4 87.5 406925No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75, Target = 74.4CPI = 75, Target = 74.4 72.1 72.1 75.0 2.9 74.4 86.1 414975On Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 73.6, Target = 80.6CPI = 73.6, Target = 80.6CPI = 73.6, Target = 80.6 66.7 71.3 73.6 2.3 80.6 83.4 623550Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 76.7, Target = 84.9CPI = 76.7, Target = 84.9CPI = 76.7, Target = 84.9 74.1 76.7 76.7 0.0 84.9 87.1 823025No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------15--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 77.2, Target = 81.8CPI = 77.2, Target = 81.8CPI = 77.2, Target = 81.8 68.8 73.5 77.2 3.7 81.8 84.4 703450Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 74, Target = 90.1CPI = 74, Target = 90.1CPI = 74, Target = 90.1 83.1- 74.0 -7.3 90.1 91.6 5260Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 72.4, Target = 85.8CPI = 72.4, Target = 85.8CPI = 72.4, Target = 85.8 75.6 70.4 72.4 2.0 85.8 87.8 118650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 73.2, Target = 85CPI = 73.2, Target = 85CPI = 73.2, Target = 85 74.3 69.6 73.2 3.6 85.0 87.2 386950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75.5, Target = 71.2CPI = 75.5, Target = 71.2CPI = 75.5, Target = 71.2 68.6 68.6 75.5 6.9 71.2 84.3 4549100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 77.1, Target = 80.6CPI = 77.1, Target = 80.6CPI = 77.1, Target = 80.6 66.7 70.4 77.1 6.7 80.6 83.4 603550Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 70.8, Target = 85.9CPI = 70.8, Target = 85.9CPI = 70.8, Target = 85.9 75.9 72.4 70.8 -1.6 85.9 88.0 673025No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------15--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 75.7, Target = 78.1CPI = 75.7, Target = 78.1CPI = 75.7, Target = 78.1 62.5 74.3 75.7 1.4 78.1 81.3 583450Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 70.2, Target = 89.4CPI = 70.2, Target = 89.4CPI = 70.2, Target = 89.4 81.9- 70.2 -7.1 89.4 91.0 4260Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students -------17--
High needs -------15--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilities -------6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------4--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 3.7 1.2860 9.9 19.8860
High needs 3.1 0.0690 12.3 21.7690
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.0 0.0490 15.7 20.4490
EL and Former EL 3.7 0.0350 22.2 22.9350
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0300 10.3 20.0300
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--15---15-
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 0.0340 14.7 14.7340
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 9.4 3.8260 6.3 19.2260
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 2.5 5.88625 22.2 11.68625
High needs 0.0 2.96925 21.5 8.76925
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 4.14925 21.6 6.14925
EL and Former EL 0.0 2.93525 22.2 11.43525
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0300 24.1 13.33025
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--15---15-
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 0.0340 17.6 11.83425
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.6 11.5260 9.4 7.72625
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--17---17-
High needs--15---15-
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities--6---6-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--4---4-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 53.0 50.0 -3.0 51.0No5150Below Target
High needsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 52.5 44.0 -8.5 51.0No3950Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51 51.0 29.0 -22.0 51.0No290Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-15--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-16--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 47.0 63.0 16.0 51.0No51100Above Target
High needsSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 47.0 62.0 15.0 51.0No39100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 48.0 53.0 5.0 51.0No2975On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-15--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-16--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 50.0 60.0330
High needs 50.0 60.0330
EL and Former EL 50.0 60.0330
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students9191100Yes9191100Yes19---
High needs7474100Yes7474100Yes17---
Econ. Disadvantaged5454100Yes5454100Yes14---
EL and Former EL3636100Yes3636100Yes8---
Students w/ disabilities3131100Yes3131100Yes7---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian7---7---1---
Afr. Amer./Black15---15---2---
Hispanic/Latino3535100Yes3535100Yes10---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White3030100Yes3030100Yes5---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles