Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Arthur T. Cummings Elementary School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Arthur T. Cummings Elementary School

Organization Information

District:

Winthrop (03460000)

School type:

Elementary-Middle School

School:

Arthur T. Cummings Elementary School (03460020)

Grades served:

04,05,06,07

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Title I School (TA)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		82.6	86.3	90.5	4.2	89.9	91.3	75	597	75	On Target
High needs		71.7	75.3	83.9	8.6	83.5	85.9	82	264	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		79.2	79.2	85.4	6.2	80.9	89.6	84	158	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		76.5	80.7	84.4	3.7	86.3	88.3	94	80	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		55.2	60.8	74.8	14.0	73.9	77.6	82	114	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		71.3	78.2	87.3	9.1	83.3	85.7	84	63	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		83.6	87.3	91.0	3.7	90.4	91.8	59	519	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		77.1	73.0	81.2	8.2	86.6	88.6	66	597	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		67.1	59.1	70.3	11.2	80.8	83.6	60	263	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		62.4	62.4	75.2	12.8	65.5	81.2	71	157	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		71.2	70.3	75.3	5.0	83.2	85.6	79	80	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		53.4	44.6	54.8	10.2	72.8	76.7	50	114	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		64.7	60.6	73.0	12.4	79.4	82.4	62	63	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		78.5	74.8	82.0	7.2	87.5	89.3	47	519	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		68.4	77.8	74.1	-3.7	81.6	84.2	68	140	0	Declined
High needs		56.3	71.9	64.3	-7.6	74.5	78.2	68	68	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		73.0	73.0	63.4	-9.6	75.3	86.5	77	43	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		37.9	65.7	55.4	-10.3	63.8	69.0	63	28	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		70.3	78.8	74.6	-4.2	82.7	85.2	42	127	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	10.8	16.2	597	25	6.4	3.2	597	25
High needs	3.4	6.1	264	25	13.7	4.9	264	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.7	7.6	158	25	11.9	4.4	158	25
EL and Former EL	1.9	6.3	80	25	11.3	3.8	80	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.9	114	25	24.6	7.9	114	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	8.5	7.9	63	0	14.9	1.6	63	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	11.2	17.3	519	25	5.5	3.5	519	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	15.8	24.6	597	25	19.8	12.1	597	25
High needs	5.4	10.6	263	25	35.5	23.2	263	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	6.4	12.1	157	25	31.2	17.2	157	25
EL and Former EL	9.4	15.0	80	25	18.9	17.5	80	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.8	1.8	114	25	54.3	40.4	114	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	10.6	22.2	63	25	31.9	22.2	63	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	16.3	25.0	519	25	17.6	11.2	519	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	11.3	7.9	140	0	5.7	11.4	140	0
High needs	6.3	5.9	68	0	9.4	20.6	68	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	10.8	2.3	43	0	8.1	23.3	43	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	28	0	18.5	28.6	28	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	12.1	8.7	127	0	5.6	11.8	127	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		53.0	67.0	14.0	51.0	Yes	572	100	Above Target
High needs		51.5	67.0	15.5	51.0	Yes	243	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		52.0	62.0	10.0	51.0	Yes	143	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		68.0	68.0	0.0	51.0	Yes	75	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		45.0	71.0	26.0	51.0	Yes	102	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		57.0	62.0	5.0	51.0	Yes	61	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		53.0	68.0	15.0	51.0	Yes	498	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		42.5	59.0	16.5	51.0	Yes	570	100	Above Target
High needs		39.0	57.5	18.5	51.0	Yes	240	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		33.0	60.0	27.0	51.0	Yes	141	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		43.5	60.0	16.5	51.0	Yes	75	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		40.5	54.5	14.0	51.0	Yes	100	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		32.0	55.0	23.0	51.0	Yes	61	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		44.0	59.5	15.5	51.0	Yes	496	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	60.0	60.0	31.00	25
High needs	60.0	60.0	31.00	25
EL and Former EL	60.0	60.0	31.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	622	620	100	Yes	622	619	100	Yes	143	142	99	Yes
High needs	285	284	100	Yes	285	282	99	Yes	71	70	99	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	174	173	99	Yes	174	172	99	Yes	45	44	98	Yes
EL and Former EL	93	93	100	Yes	93	93	100	Yes	25	24	96	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	120	120	100	Yes	120	119	99	Yes	28	28	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	78	78	100	Yes	78	78	100	Yes	13	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	529	527	100	Yes	529	526	99	Yes	128	128	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.