Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Murdock High School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Murdock High School
Organization Information
District:Winchendon (03430000)School type:High School
School:Murdock High School (03430515)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:CentralTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.9, Target = 93.8CPI = 93.9, Target = 93.8 91.7 92.3 93.9 1.6 93.8 95.9 165775On Target
High needsCPI = 90.2, Target = 90.2CPI = 90.2, Target = 90.2 86.9 85.0 90.2 5.2 90.2 93.5 202875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.6, Target = 95.1CPI = 93.6, Target = 95.1CPI = 93.6, Target = 95.1 93.4 92.7 93.6 0.9 95.1 96.7 35150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.9, Target = 84.7CPI = 83.9, Target = 84.7 79.6 78.3 83.9 5.6 84.7 89.8 205675On Target
High needsCPI = 76.8, Target = 78CPI = 76.8, Target = 78CPI = 76.8, Target = 78 70.7 65.0 76.8 11.8 78.0 85.4 262875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.5, Target = 85.2CPI = 84.5, Target = 85.2 80.2 78.6 84.5 5.9 85.2 90.1 75075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.9, Target = 84.6CPI = 84.9, Target = 84.6 79.5 78.2 84.9 6.7 84.6 89.8 245375On Target
High needsCPI = 82.3, Target = 78.7CPI = 82.3, Target = 78.7CPI = 82.3, Target = 78.7 71.6 69.4 82.3 12.9 78.7 85.8 4724100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.6, Target = 85.3CPI = 85.6, Target = 85.3 80.4 78.4 85.6 7.2 85.3 90.2 104775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.6 15.8570 2.9 3.5570
High needs 6.7 10.72825 6.7 7.1280
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.4 17.6510 1.6 3.9510
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 30.4 33.95625 11.6 7.15625
High needs 13.3 21.42825 23.3 10.72825
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 28.6 34.05025 9.5 6.05025
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 12.7 9.4530 3.2 1.95325
High needs 3.7 8.32425 7.4 0.02425
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 10.3 10.6470 3.4 2.14725
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 24.0 32.0 8.0 51.0Yes5175On Target
High needsSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 21.0 37.0 16.0 51.0Yes25100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-18--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 23.0 32.0 9.0 51.0Yes4675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 48.0 51.0 3.0 51.0No5175On Target
High needsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 44.5 50.0 5.5 51.0Yes2575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-18--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 45.0 51.0 6.0 51.0Yes4675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 81.8, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 81.8, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 81.8, Target = 80 87.2 81.8 -5.4 80.0 90.07775On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 70.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 70.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 70.2, Target = 80 76.2 70.2 -6.0 80.0 90.0470Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.01--
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.018--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.02--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.04--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.04--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 83.6, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 83.6, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 83.6, Target = 80 89.0 83.6 -5.4 80.0 90.06775On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 89.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 89.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 89.5, Target = 85 91.0 89.5 -1.5 85.0 95.08675On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 81, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 81, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 81, Target = 85 89.7 81.0 -8.7 85.0 95.0420Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.012--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.01--
Asian --- 85.0 95.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.03--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 91.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 91.5, Target = 85 91.6 91.5 -0.1 85.0 95.08275On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 5.5, Target = 2 2.6 2.8 5.5 -2.7 2.0 1.3153300Declined
High needsDropout Rate = 8.2, Target = 2.7 3.6 3.4 8.2 -4.8 2.7 1.8111470Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------93--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------81--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 5.4, Target = 1.9 2.5 2.3 5.4 -3.1 1.9 1.3102980Declined
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students10
High needs10
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students5959100Yes5858100Yes5959100Yes
High needs2929100Yes2929100Yes2929100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged20---20---20---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities13---13---13---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black2---2---2---
Hispanic/Latino4---4---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White5151100Yes5050100Yes5151100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles