Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Field Elementary School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Field Elementary School

Organization Information

District:

Weston (03300000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Field Elementary School (03300012)

Grades served:

04,05

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		93.1	93.3	94.7	1.4	96.0	96.6	93	311	100	Above Target
High needs		79.9	81.7	83.4	1.7	88.3	90.0	83	83	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		76.8	77.3	78.3	1.0	86.5	88.4	85	60	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		95.9	95.8	95.7	-0.1	97.6	98.0	67	35	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		93.8	94.7	95.3	0.6	96.4	96.9	93	223	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		89.8	93.1	95.3	2.2	94.1	94.9	95	309	100	Above Target
High needs		71.1	79.5	84.1	4.6	83.1	85.6	83	82	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		65.5	75.9	78.4	2.5	79.9	82.8	85	59	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		95.3	96.6	100.0	3.4	97.3	97.7	96	35	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		91.8	94.2	95.6	1.4	95.2	95.9	93	222	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		90.8	89.7	91.0	1.3	94.6	95.4	87	156	75	On Target
High needs		74.4	72.4	79.3	6.9	85.1	87.2	85	46	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		72.5	66.1	75.0	8.9	84.0	86.3	87	32	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		93.1	90.2	91.4	1.2	96.0	96.6	82	111	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	24.1	31.8	311	25	2.1	2.3	311	0
High needs	5.1	9.6	83	25	9.0	8.4	83	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.8	6.7	60	25	10.9	11.7	60	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	38.9	51.4	35	25	0.0	0.0	35	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	24.8	31.4	223	25	1.3	2.2	223	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	52.5	61.8	309	25	2.2	1.9	309	25
High needs	15.6	30.5	82	25	9.1	7.3	82	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Students w/ disabilities	7.5	18.6	59	25	11.3	10.2	59	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	78.4	85.7	35	0	2.7	0.0	35	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	52.8	63.1	222	25	0.9	0.9	222	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	32.6	34.0	156	0	2.9	1.9	156	25
High needs	15.4	6.5	46	0	12.8	6.5	46	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Students w/ disabilities	7.1	6.3	32	0	17.9	9.4	32	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	31.7	33.3	111	0	2.5	2.7	111	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		43.0	61.0	18.0	51.0	Yes	297	100	Above Target
High needs		27.0	57.0	30.0	51.0	No	79	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		26.0	59.0	33.0	51.0	No	59	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		49.0	66.0	17.0	51.0	Yes	31	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		45.0	61.0	16.0	51.0	Yes	217	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		66.0	62.0	-4.0	51.0	Yes	293	100	Above Target
High needs		60.0	57.5	-2.5	51.0	Yes	76	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		52.0	48.0	-4.0	51.0	Yes	55	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		84.5	62.0	-22.5	51.0	Yes	32	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		65.0	62.0	-3.0	51.0	Yes	213	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	15.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	15.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	15.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	316	316	100	Yes	316	314	99	Yes	161	160	99	Yes
High needs	87	87	100	Yes	87	86	99	Yes	49	49	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	11	-	-	-	11	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	25	-	-	-	25	-	-	-	17	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	60	60	100	Yes	60	59	98	Yes	32	32	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	37	37	100	Yes	37	37	100	Yes	21	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	22	-	-	-	22	-	-	-	11	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	18	-	-	-	18	-	-	-	9	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	225	225	100	Yes	225	224	100	Yes	114	113	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.