Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Howard School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Howard School
Organization Information
District:West Bridgewater (03230000)School type:Elementary School
School:Howard School (03230305)Grades served:04,05,06
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.1, Target = 94.6CPI = 88.1, Target = 94.6CPI = 88.1, Target = 94.6 90.7 89.0 88.1 -0.9 94.6 95.4 6227125No Change
High needsCPI = 74.6, Target = 86.6CPI = 74.6, Target = 86.6CPI = 74.6, Target = 86.6 77.1 74.3 74.6 0.3 86.6 88.6 436750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80, Target = 83CPI = 80, Target = 83CPI = 80, Target = 83 81.4 81.4 80.0 -1.4 83.0 90.7 664525No Change
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 58, Target = 81.5CPI = 58, Target = 81.5CPI = 58, Target = 81.5 68.2 58.6 58.0 -0.6 81.5 84.1 312225No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89, Target = 94.4CPI = 89, Target = 94.4CPI = 89, Target = 94.4 90.4 88.7 89.0 0.3 94.4 95.2 5524850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.6, Target = 92.9CPI = 86.6, Target = 92.9CPI = 86.6, Target = 92.9 87.8 84.9 86.6 1.7 92.9 93.9 5427150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 70.1, Target = 84.2CPI = 70.1, Target = 84.2CPI = 70.1, Target = 84.2 72.9 71.4 70.1 -1.3 84.2 86.5 266725No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75.6, Target = 78.6CPI = 75.6, Target = 78.6CPI = 75.6, Target = 78.6 76.7 76.7 75.6 -1.1 78.6 88.4 454525No Change
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 48.9, Target = 80.1CPI = 48.9, Target = 80.1CPI = 48.9, Target = 80.1 65.9 56.3 48.9 -7.4 80.1 83.0 12220Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.1, Target = 92.8CPI = 87.1, Target = 92.8CPI = 87.1, Target = 92.8 87.7 85.1 87.1 2.0 92.8 93.9 4424850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.1, Target = 85.9CPI = 84.1, Target = 85.9CPI = 84.1, Target = 85.9 75.8 85.5 84.1 -1.4 85.9 87.9 618825No Change
High needs -------13--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.5, Target = 86.6CPI = 83.5, Target = 86.6CPI = 83.5, Target = 86.6 77.1 86.1 83.5 -2.6 86.6 88.6 42820Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.6 8.52710 3.9 3.72710
High needs 2.9 1.5670 14.3 10.46725
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.7 2.2450 7.0 8.9450
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0220 27.6 22.72225
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.5 8.92480 3.8 2.824825
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 21.4 27.327125 4.6 7.72710
High needs 7.2 10.46725 13.0 25.4670
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.3 13.34525 4.7 15.6450
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 7.1 0.0220 28.6 59.1220
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.8 27.824825 5.0 7.72480
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.0 22.78825 4.0 3.48825
High needs--13---13-
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--5---5-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.7 22.08225 3.2 3.7820
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51 35.0 33.0 -2.0 51.0No26925Below Target
High needsSGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51 30.0 28.0 -2.0 51.0No670Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51 33.0 28.0 -5.0 51.0No450Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51SGP = 29, Target = 51 17.5 29.0 11.5 51.0No2275On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51 35.0 33.0 -2.0 51.0No24725Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 29.0 34.0 5.0 51.0Yes26775On Target
High needsSGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51 25.5 28.0 2.5 51.0No6750Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51 21.0 30.0 9.0 51.0Yes4575On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 18.5, Target = 51SGP = 18.5, Target = 51SGP = 18.5, Target = 51 29.0 18.5 -10.5 51.0No220Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 28.5 34.0 5.5 51.0Yes24575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students27727399Yes27727399Yes898899Yes
High needs696899Yes696899Yes13---
Econ. Disadvantaged474698Yes474698Yes8---
EL and Former EL7---7---1---
Students w/ disabilities232296Yes232296Yes5---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian3---3-------
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---2---
Hispanic/Latino11---11---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White25325099Yes25325099Yes838299Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles