Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Joseph Case High
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Joseph Case High
Organization Information
District:Swansea (02920000)School type:High School
School:Joseph Case High (02920505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 98.9, Target = 96.9CPI = 98.9, Target = 96.9CPI = 98.9, Target = 96.9 94.6 97.5 98.9 1.4 96.9 97.3 66117100Above Target
High needsCPI = 95.7, Target = 91.4CPI = 95.7, Target = 91.4CPI = 95.7, Target = 91.4 85.3 92.1 95.7 3.6 91.4 92.7 5829100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------23--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 98.9, Target = 97.4CPI = 98.9, Target = 97.4CPI = 98.9, Target = 97.4 95.5 97.4 98.9 1.5 97.4 97.8 56110100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 96.2, Target = 96.2CPI = 96.2, Target = 96.2 93.5 91.5 96.2 4.7 96.2 96.8 7711775On Target
High needsCPI = 90.5, Target = 89.1CPI = 90.5, Target = 89.1CPI = 90.5, Target = 89.1 81.3 81.7 90.5 8.8 89.1 90.7 8429100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------23--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.1, Target = 96.7CPI = 96.1, Target = 96.7 94.3 91.3 96.1 4.8 96.7 97.2 6711075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 98.2, Target = 91.1CPI = 98.2, Target = 91.1CPI = 98.2, Target = 91.1 84.7 93.9 98.2 4.3 91.1 92.4 93113100Above Target
High needsCPI = 95.2, Target = 85.4CPI = 95.2, Target = 85.4CPI = 95.2, Target = 85.4 75.0 88.9 95.2 6.3 85.4 87.5 9526100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------21--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 98.1, Target = 91.4CPI = 98.1, Target = 91.4CPI = 98.1, Target = 91.4 85.2 94.1 98.1 4.0 91.4 92.6 87107100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 45.0 59.011725 1.5 0.011725
High needs 31.7 31.0290 4.9 0.02925
Econ. Disadvantaged--23---23-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 46.0 58.211025 1.6 0.011025
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 56.1 67.511725 4.5 1.711725
High needs 39.0 51.72925 14.6 6.92925
Econ. Disadvantaged--23---23-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 57.5 66.411025 4.7 1.811025
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 31.7 48.711325 0.8 0.011325
High needs 13.9 19.22625 2.8 0.02625
Econ. Disadvantaged--21---21-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 32.8 48.610725 0.8 0.010725
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 55.0 64.0 9.0 51.0Yes111100Above Target
High needsSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 46.0 64.0 18.0 51.0No25100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-20--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 56.5 64.0 7.5 51.0Yes105100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51 66.5 70.0 3.5 51.0Yes114100Above Target
High needsSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 67.5 64.0 -3.5 51.0Yes27100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51 66.5 70.0 3.5 51.0Yes108100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 93.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.2, Target = 80 98.0 93.2 -4.8 80.0 90.014875On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 89.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 89.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 89.4, Target = 80 95.1 89.4 -5.7 80.0 90.06675On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.01--
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.027--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.03--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.06--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.04--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.03--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 95.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.5, Target = 80 97.8 95.5 -2.3 80.0 90.0132100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 98, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 98, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 98, Target = 85 88.7 98.0 9.3 85.0 95.0148100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 95.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.1, Target = 85 76.6 95.1 18.5 85.0 95.061100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.022--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.02--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.0---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.06--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 97.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 97.8, Target = 85 88.6 97.8 9.2 85.0 95.0139100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0.7, Target = 0.4 0.7 1.3 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.46253550Improved Below Target
High needsDropout Rate = 0, Target = 0.5 0.9 2.6 0.0 2.6 0.5 0.591139100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------93--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------60--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------13--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.4, Target = 0.4 0.7 1.2 0.4 0.8 0.4 0.46750075On Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students12011898Yes12111998Yes12112099Yes
High needs323098Yes323098Yes323197Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged25---25---25---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities11---11---11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1---1---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino2---2---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White11311198Yes11411298Yes11411399Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles