Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Benjamin Swan Elementary

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Homer Street

Organization Information

District:

Springfield (02810000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Homer Street (02810085)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		63.1	66.9	74.2	7.3	78.5	81.6	14	179	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		62.7	66.2	73.1	6.9	78.2	81.4	37	158	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		66.8	66.8	73.7	6.9	69.6	83.4	34	153	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		63.3	58.3	67.8	9.5	78.6	81.7	40	38	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		43.0	45.7	50.8	5.1	66.8	71.5	15	31	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		65.2	74.2	77.6	3.4	79.7	82.6	66	39	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		63.0	64.1	73.3	9.2	78.4	81.5	55	121	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		59.9	75.7	74.7	-1.0	76.6	80.0	15	179	25	No Change
High needs		59.5	76.1	74.2	-1.9	76.4	79.8	43	158	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		76.6	76.6	75.0	-1.6	78.6	88.3	43	153	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		61.4	69.4	71.7	2.3	77.5	80.7	44	38	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		47.8	57.5	54.8	-2.7	69.6	73.9	22	31	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		59.2	72.7	76.3	3.6	76.2	79.6	67	39	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		60.5	76.5	74.6	-1.9	77.0	80.3	54	121	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		52.2	65.5	60.1	-5.4	72.1	76.1	13	52	0	Declined
High needs		52.2	64.6	58.3	-6.3	72.1	76.1	25	42	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		64.6	64.6	60.0	-4.6	67.6	82.3	36	40	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		47.1	63.5	57.4	-6.1	69.1	73.6	44	34	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.8	8.4	179	25	21.2	10.1	179	25
High needs	2.4	5.1	158	25	21.6	10.1	158	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.4	4.6	153	25	20.7	8.5	153	25
EL and Former EL	0.0	2.6	38	25	27.8	15.8	38	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	31	0	43.9	35.5	31	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	9.1	15.4	39	25	18.2	7.7	39	25
Hispanic/Latino	1.5	5.8	121	25	23.3	10.7	121	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	17.1	10.6	179	0	15.4	15.1	179	0
High needs	16.0	7.6	158	0	14.7	15.8	158	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	16.3	6.5	153	0	13.8	14.4	153	0
EL and Former EL	11.1	7.9	38	0	19.4	18.4	38	0
Students w/ disabilities	5.0	3.2	31	0	27.5	38.7	31	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	9.4	15.4	39	25	21.9	7.7	39	25
Hispanic/Latino	18.2	8.3	121	0	12.9	15.7	121	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	16.4	1.9	52	0	23.6	23.1	52	0
High needs	16.7	0.0	42	0	27.1	26.2	42	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	16.7	0.0	40	0	27.1	22.5	40	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Hispanic/Latino	15.4	2.9	34	0	23.1	29.4	34	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		27.0	49.0	22.0	51.0	No	96	100	Above Target
High needs		28.0	48.0	20.0	51.0	No	83	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		28.0	48.0	20.0	51.0	No	81	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		27.0	48.5	21.5	51.0	No	20	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		21.5	49.0	27.5	51.0	Yes	70	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		33.0	24.0	-9.0	51.0	No	95	0	Below Target
High needs		37.0	24.0	-13.0	51.0	No	83	0	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		38.0	24.0	-14.0	51.0	No	81	0	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		33.0	33.5	0.5	51.0	No	20	50	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		37.0	23.5	-13.5	51.0	No	70	0	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	69.0	60.0	55.00	25
High needs	69.0	60.0	55.00	25
EL and Former EL	69.0	60.0	55.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	198	197	99	Yes	198	197	99	Yes	58	58	100	Yes
High needs	175	174	99	Yes	175	174	99	Yes	47	47	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	170	169	99	Yes	170	169	99	Yes	45	45	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	42	42	100	Yes	42	42	100	Yes	11	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	33	33	100	Yes	33	33	100	Yes	8	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	46	45	98	Yes	46	45	98	Yes	16	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	132	132	100	Yes	132	132	100	Yes	38	38	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	18	-	-	-	18	-	-	-	3	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.