Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Edward P. Boland School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Edward P. Boland School

Organization Information

District:

Springfield (02810000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Edward P. Boland School (02810010)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		69.6	76.0	76.5	0.5	82.3	84.8	20	267	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		69.3	75.2	74.8	-0.4	82.1	84.7	44	235	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		75.8	75.8	75.4	-0.4	77.8	87.9	43	211	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		59.1	70.7	70.6	-0.1	76.1	79.6	51	74	25	No Change
Students w/ disabilities		58.1	59.4	67.2	7.8	75.6	79.1	58	51	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		73.0	-	79.7	12.5	84.3	86.5	75	32	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		67.5	74.9	76.3	1.4	81.0	83.8	66	213	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		63.0	69.1	73.8	4.7	78.4	81.5	13	265	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		62.8	69.3	72.5	3.2	78.3	81.4	34	233	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		69.6	69.6	72.5	2.9	72.1	84.8	34	209	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		56.6	69.4	77.1	7.7	74.7	78.3	60	73	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		54.0	57.8	63.2	5.4	73.2	77.0	46	51	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		60.1	-	73.4	8.6	76.7	80.1	56	32	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		61.4	68.5	73.1	4.6	77.5	80.7	46	211	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		71.7	63.8	78.9	15.1	83.5	85.9	43	89	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		71.4	62.3	78.2	15.9	83.3	85.7	83	79	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		64.2	64.2	78.3	14.1	67.2	82.1	88	75	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		66.7	54.8	73.9	19.1	80.6	83.4	91	23	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		71.4	64.8	80.5	15.7	83.3	85.7	96	73	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.5	3.4	267	25	10.8	13.9	267	0
High needs	2.9	3.4	235	25	11.3	15.3	235	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.3	3.8	211	25	10.2	14.2	211	0
EL and Former EL	1.4	0.0	74	0	14.5	23.0	74	0
Students w/ disabilities	1.6	0.0	51	0	29.7	19.6	51	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	3.1	3.1	32	0	21.9	12.5	32	25
Hispanic/Latino	2.5	3.8	213	25	11.4	12.7	213	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	8.2	12.8	265	25	19.6	18.5	265	0
High needs	7.5	12.0	233	25	19.9	19.7	233	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.9	12.9	209	25	18.5	19.6	209	0
EL and Former EL	5.6	13.7	73	25	23.9	15.1	73	25
Students w/ disabilities	3.1	0.0	51	0	39.1	33.3	51	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	12.5	9.4	32	0	28.1	15.6	32	25
Hispanic/Latino	8.4	12.8	211	25	20.1	19.0	211	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	4.2	10.1	89	25	22.9	9.0	89	25
High needs	4.8	8.9	79	25	25.3	10.1	79	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.4	9.3	75	25	20.3	10.7	75	25
EL and Former EL	3.8	13.0	23	25	34.6	13.0	23	25
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Hispanic/Latino	4.8	11.0	73	25	24.1	8.2	73	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		56.0	52.0	-4.0	51.0	No	157	75	On Target
High needs		58.0	51.0	-7.0	51.0	No	135	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		58.0	53.5	-4.5	51.0	No	126	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		59.0	57.0	-2.0	51.0	Yes	37	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		36.0	63.0	27.0	51.0	Yes	21	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		55.5	55.0	-0.5	51.0	No	135	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		43.5	46.5	3.0	51.0	Yes	156	75	On Target
High needs		43.5	46.5	3.0	51.0	Yes	134	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		46.0	47.0	1.0	51.0	Yes	125	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		57.5	54.0	-3.5	51.0	Yes	37	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		31.5	38.0	6.5	51.0	No	21	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		44.0	46.0	2.0	51.0	Yes	134	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	65.0	60.0	114.00	25
High needs	65.0	60.0	114.00	25
EL and Former EL	65.0	60.0	114.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	296	295	100	Yes	296	293	99	Yes	95	95	100	Yes
High needs	262	261	100	Yes	262	259	99	Yes	84	84	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	237	236	100	Yes	237	234	99	Yes	80	80	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	87	86	99	Yes	87	85	98	Yes	26	26	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	57	57	100	Yes	57	57	100	Yes	15	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	34	34	100	Yes	34	34	100	Yes	12	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	236	235	100	Yes	236	233	99	Yes	78	78	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	20	-	-	-	20	-	-	-	4	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.