Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Arthur W Coolidge Middle

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Arthur W Coolidge Middle

Organization Information

District:

Reading (02460000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Arthur W Coolidge Middle (02460305)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Northeast

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		96.5	93.4	94.3	0.9	98.0	98.3	76	466	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		86.9	78.2	80.6	2.4	92.4	93.5	50	124	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		88.8	88.8	88.2	-0.6	89.7	94.4	76	38	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		86.1	75.0	75.8	0.8	91.9	93.1	70	99	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		96.7	93.7	94.5	0.8	98.1	98.4	68	422	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		89.6	86.6	88.8	2.2	93.9	94.8	84	465	75	On Target
High needs		69.3	62.7	66.3	3.6	82.1	84.7	63	123	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		74.1	74.1	76.3	2.2	76.3	87.1	82	38	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		66.8	58.7	58.4	-0.3	80.6	83.4	77	98	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		89.6	86.6	89.0	2.4	93.9	94.8	80	421	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		79.0	72.9	74.7	1.8	87.8	89.5	48	150	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		60.3	51.3	48.7	-2.6	76.8	80.2	11	39	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		57.6	46.8	41.9	-4.9	75.3	78.8	17	31	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		78.9	72.5	74.3	1.8	87.7	89.5	32	135	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	22.2	32.4	466	25	4.1	3.9	466	0
High needs	5.6	8.1	124	25	15.3	13.7	124	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	13.8	18.4	38	25	3.4	10.5	38	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.9	5.1	99	25	18.1	17.2	99	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	21.5	31.3	422	25	4.2	3.6	422	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	37.1	49.7	465	25	9.1	8.8	465	0
High needs	7.4	10.6	123	25	32.8	31.7	123	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	25.0	21.1	38	0	21.4	18.4	38	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.9	4.1	98	25	36.9	39.8	98	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	37.1	50.8	421	25	9.0	8.8	421	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.3	5.3	150	25	11.5	14.0	150	0
High needs	0.0	2.6	39	25	35.9	43.6	39	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	31	0	41.9	54.8	31	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.7	4.4	135	25	11.3	14.8	135	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		64.0	62.0	-2.0	51.0	Yes	454	100	Above Target
High needs		51.0	47.5	-3.5	51.0	Yes	118	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		43.0	49.0	6.0	51.0	Yes	37	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		51.0	44.5	-6.5	51.0	No	94	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	20	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		64.0	62.0	-2.0	51.0	Yes	411	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		63.0	70.0	7.0	51.0	Yes	451	100	Above Target
High needs		44.0	58.0	14.0	51.0	Yes	115	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		50.5	61.0	10.5	51.0	Yes	37	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		44.0	54.0	10.0	51.0	No	91	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	20	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		62.0	70.0	8.0	51.0	Yes	408	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	1.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	1.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	1.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	470	469	100	Yes	470	468	100	Yes	153	151	99	Yes
High needs	127	127	100	Yes	127	126	99	Yes	40	40	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	39	39	100	Yes	39	39	100	Yes	10	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	101	101	100	Yes	101	100	99	Yes	32	32	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	20	-	-	-	20	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	11	-	-	-	11	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	426	425	100	Yes	426	424	100	Yes	138	136	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.