Massachusetts School and District Profiles

A E Angier
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - A E Angier
Organization Information
District:Newton (02070000)School type:Elementary School
School:A E Angier (02070005)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.4, Target = 95.9CPI = 93.4, Target = 95.9CPI = 93.4, Target = 95.9 93.0 95.6 93.4 -2.2 95.9 96.5 8719675On Target
High needsCPI = 83.6, Target = 89.3CPI = 83.6, Target = 89.3CPI = 83.6, Target = 89.3 81.6 88.6 83.6 -5.0 89.3 90.8 83640Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------15--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 79.6, Target = 88.5CPI = 79.6, Target = 88.5CPI = 79.6, Target = 88.5 80.2 87.7 79.6 -8.1 88.5 90.1 88490Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 92.4, Target = 95.9CPI = 92.4, Target = 95.9CPI = 92.4, Target = 95.9 92.9 94.4 92.4 -2.0 95.9 96.5 433375On Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.2, Target = 96.9CPI = 95.2, Target = 96.9CPI = 95.2, Target = 96.9 94.7 96.6 95.2 -1.4 96.9 97.4 92129100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.3, Target = 95.2CPI = 90.3, Target = 95.2CPI = 90.3, Target = 95.2 91.7 88.6 90.3 1.7 95.2 95.9 7219650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 77.3, Target = 88.3CPI = 77.3, Target = 88.3CPI = 77.3, Target = 88.3 79.9 75.4 77.3 1.9 88.3 90.0 566450Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------15--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 71.4, Target = 86.9CPI = 71.4, Target = 86.9CPI = 71.4, Target = 86.9 77.6 71.5 71.4 -0.1 86.9 88.8 694925No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 92.4, Target = 94.5CPI = 92.4, Target = 94.5CPI = 92.4, Target = 94.5 90.5 94.4 92.4 -2.0 94.5 95.3 323375On Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.1, Target = 96.2CPI = 92.1, Target = 96.2CPI = 92.1, Target = 96.2 93.5 90.8 92.1 1.3 96.2 96.8 7612975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.8, Target = 94.7CPI = 90.8, Target = 94.7CPI = 90.8, Target = 94.7 90.9 91.8 90.8 -1.0 94.7 95.5 867375On Target
High needs  75.0---- 87.5-22--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------5--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------12--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90, Target = 97.3CPI = 90, Target = 97.3CPI = 90, Target = 97.3 95.3 95.5 90.0 -5.5 97.3 97.7 765075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 31.5 36.219625 1.0 3.11960
High needs 8.8 9.4640 2.9 9.4640
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--15---15-
Students w/ disabilities 7.8 6.1490 3.9 12.2490
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 48.4 36.4330 0.0 3.0330
Afr. Amer./Black--10---10-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 30.6 40.312925 1.6 2.31290
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 43.9 54.119625 5.1 5.61960
High needs 13.4 25.06425 14.9 15.6640
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--15---15-
Students w/ disabilities 12.0 18.44925 18.0 20.4490
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 71.0 72.7330 6.5 6.1330
Afr. Amer./Black--10---10-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 41.0 54.312925 2.5 3.91290
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 42.2 39.7730 1.6 5.5730
High needs--22---22-
Econ. Disadvantaged--5---5-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--12---12-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 42.4 38.0500 3.0 6.0500
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 63.0 49.0 -14.0 51.0No12750Below Target
High needsSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 59.5 39.0 -20.5 51.0No4525Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-11--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-11--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 61.5 36.0 -25.5 51.0No3425Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-22--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 64.0 55.0 -9.0 51.0No8275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 50.0 40.0 -10.0 51.0Yes12775On Target
High needsSGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51 35.0 33.0 -2.0 51.0Yes4575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-11--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-11--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 35.0 32.0 -3.0 51.0Yes3475On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-22--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 43.5, Target = 51SGP = 43.5, Target = 51SGP = 43.5, Target = 51 50.0 43.5 -6.5 51.0Yes8275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.012-
High needs- 60.012-
EL and Former EL- 60.012-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students20319998Yes20319998Yes747399Yes
High needs706796Yes706796Yes232296Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged15---15---5---
EL and Former EL17---17---4---
Students w/ disabilities545195Yes545194No18---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3333100Yes3333100Yes12---
Afr. Amer./Black10---10---4---
Hispanic/Latino13---13---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.13---13---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White13413299Yes13413299Yes515098Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles