Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Nantucket High
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Nantucket High
Organization Information
District:Nantucket (01970000)School type:High School
School:Nantucket High (01970505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.8, Target = 98.5CPI = 97.8, Target = 98.5 97.5 93.5 97.8 4.3 98.5 98.8 44115100Above Target
High needsCPI = 92.9, Target = 95.6CPI = 92.9, Target = 95.6CPI = 92.9, Target = 95.6 92.4 84.8 92.9 8.1 95.6 96.2 353550Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------17--
Hispanic/Latino -------23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 100, Target = 99.5CPI = 100, Target = 99.5 99.1 99.3 100.0 0.7 99.5 99.6 9772100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85, Target = 94CPI = 85, Target = 94CPI = 85, Target = 94 89.7 83.8 85.0 1.2 94.0 94.9 2311550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 58.6, Target = 86.7CPI = 58.6, Target = 86.7CPI = 58.6, Target = 86.7 77.2 66.3 58.6 -7.7 86.7 88.6 3350Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------17--
Hispanic/Latino -------23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.7, Target = 97.6CPI = 92.7, Target = 97.6CPI = 92.7, Target = 97.6 95.8 93.1 92.7 -0.4 97.6 97.9 417225No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.4, Target = 92.9CPI = 92.4, Target = 92.9 87.8 88.3 92.4 4.1 92.9 93.9 5210975On Target
High needsCPI = 79.7, Target = 86.7CPI = 79.7, Target = 86.7CPI = 79.7, Target = 86.7 77.2 76.1 79.7 3.6 86.7 88.6 343250Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------16--
Hispanic/Latino -------20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.4, Target = 93.5CPI = 96.4, Target = 93.5CPI = 96.4, Target = 93.5 88.9 95.1 96.4 1.3 93.5 94.5 7170100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 55.0 55.71150 2.7 0.911525
High needs 26.1 25.7350 6.5 2.93525
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--17---17-
Hispanic/Latino--23---23-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 69.4 66.7720 0.0 0.07225
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 39.6 39.11150 13.5 11.311525
High needs 17.4 8.6350 30.4 37.1350
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--17---17-
Hispanic/Latino--23---23-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 50.0 50.0720 6.9 4.27225
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 30.5 35.810925 3.8 1.810925
High needs 17.8 9.4320 8.9 6.33225
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--16---16-
Hispanic/Latino--20---20-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 40.3 47.17025 0.0 0.07025
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 71.5, Target = 51SGP = 71.5, Target = 51SGP = 71.5, Target = 51 69.0 71.5 2.5 51.0Yes94100Above Target
High needs --- 51.0-27--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-15--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 69.0 62.0 -7.0 51.0Yes61100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 47.0 37.0 -10.0 51.0No9525Below Target
High needsSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 42.0 37.0 -5.0 51.0No2725Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-15--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 36.5, Target = 51SGP = 36.5, Target = 51SGP = 36.5, Target = 51 54.0 36.5 -17.5 51.0No6225Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 41.0 60.0290
High needs 41.0 60.0290
EL and Former EL- 60.029-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 86.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 86.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 86.2, Target = 80 82.7 86.2 3.5 80.0 90.010975On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 75.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 75.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 75.5, Target = 80 65.8 75.5 9.7 80.0 90.04950Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.010--
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.023--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.05--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.017--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.013--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.02--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 94.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.4, Target = 80 92.8 94.4 1.6 80.0 90.07275On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 86.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 86.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 86.5, Target = 85 87.0 86.5 -0.5 85.0 95.010475On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 71.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 71.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 71.1, Target = 85 80.6 71.1 -9.5 85.0 95.0380Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.08--
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.020--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.03--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.013--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.018--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.01--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.7, Target = 85 93.4 95.7 2.3 85.0 95.069100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 2.5, Target = 0.8 1.3 1.3 2.5 -1.2 0.8 0.7264890Declined
High needsDropout Rate = 5.4, Target = 2.6 4.5 4.7 5.4 -0.7 2.6 2.3181660Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------58--
EL and Former EL -------47--
Students w/ disabilities -------82--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------69--
Hispanic/Latino -------85--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.3, Target = 0.4 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.47331475On Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students12912798Yes12912798Yes129129100Yes
High needs474698Yes474698Yes4747100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged26---26---26---
EL and Former EL21---21---21---
Students w/ disabilities17---17---17---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1---1---
Afr. Amer./Black18---18---18---
Hispanic/Latino35---35---35---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White7373100Yes7373100Yes7373100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles