Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Dale Street
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Dale Street
Organization Information
District:Medfield (01750000)School type:Elementary School
School:Dale Street (01750005)Grades served:04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.7, Target = 96CPI = 95.7, Target = 96 93.1 92.0 95.7 3.7 96.0 96.6 98387100Above Target
High needsCPI = 86.9, Target = 85.4CPI = 86.9, Target = 85.4CPI = 86.9, Target = 85.4 75.0 75.0 86.9 11.9 85.4 87.5 9261100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 86.4, Target = 85.1CPI = 86.4, Target = 85.1CPI = 86.4, Target = 85.1 74.5 71.7 86.4 14.7 85.1 87.3 9744100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------15--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.8, Target = 95.9CPI = 95.8, Target = 95.9 93.0 92.4 95.8 3.4 95.9 96.5 95347100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.1, Target = 93.1CPI = 95.1, Target = 93.1CPI = 95.1, Target = 93.1 88.2 93.2 95.1 1.9 93.1 94.1 94386100Above Target
High needsCPI = 83.2, Target = 79.5CPI = 83.2, Target = 79.5CPI = 83.2, Target = 79.5 64.9 76.5 83.2 6.7 79.5 82.5 8161100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 80.7, Target = 79.1CPI = 80.7, Target = 79.1CPI = 80.7, Target = 79.1 64.1 74.5 80.7 6.2 79.1 82.1 9044100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------15--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.6, Target = 92.9CPI = 95.6, Target = 92.9CPI = 95.6, Target = 92.9 87.9 93.3 95.6 2.3 92.9 94.0 93346100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.6, Target = 93.3CPI = 87.6, Target = 93.3CPI = 87.6, Target = 93.3 88.5 87.3 87.6 0.3 93.3 94.3 7320050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 69.7, Target = 81.3CPI = 69.7, Target = 81.3CPI = 69.7, Target = 81.3 67.9 67.6 69.7 2.1 81.3 84.0 573350Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 71.6, Target = 80.9CPI = 71.6, Target = 80.9CPI = 71.6, Target = 80.9 67.3 64.4 71.6 7.2 80.9 83.7 772250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.3, Target = 93.2CPI = 88.3, Target = 93.2CPI = 88.3, Target = 93.2 88.3 87.1 88.3 1.2 93.2 94.2 6618250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.4 31.338725 3.0 0.538725
High needs 6.2 11.56125 15.4 3.36125
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 4.4 9.14425 15.6 4.54425
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--15---15-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 20.9 32.934725 2.7 0.634725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 45.8 53.438625 2.2 1.038625
High needs 16.7 18.0610 10.6 4.96125
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 15.2 11.4440 15.2 6.84425
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--15---15-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 46.2 54.634625 2.4 1.234625
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 18.4 20.02000 4.3 4.02000
High needs 5.4 12.13325 21.6 15.23325
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 3.8 9.12225 26.9 9.12225
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 17.4 20.918225 4.7 3.318225
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 49.5 67.0 17.5 51.0Yes379100Above Target
High needsSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 36.0 64.0 28.0 51.0Yes57100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 32.0 61.0 29.0 51.0Yes41100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-2--
Asian --- 51.0-15--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 50.0 65.0 15.0 51.0Yes339100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51 69.0 66.0 -3.0 51.0Yes379100Above Target
High needsSGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51 62.0 57.5 -4.5 51.0Yes5875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51 59.0 53.5 -5.5 51.0Yes4275On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-2--
Asian --- 51.0-15--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51 69.0 66.0 -3.0 51.0Yes339100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students396395100Yes39639499Yes207206100Yes
High needs6666100Yes6666100Yes3737100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged19---19---13---
EL and Former EL8---8---6---
Students w/ disabilities4646100Yes4646100Yes2323100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.3---3---1---
Asian16---16---8---
Afr. Amer./Black4---4---2---
Hispanic/Latino9---9---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.12---12---6---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White352351100Yes35235099Yes18618599Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles