Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mashpee Middle-High School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Mashpee High

Organization Information
District:Mashpee (01720000)School type:High School
School:Mashpee High (01720505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.2, Target = 97.6CPI = 97.2, Target = 97.6 95.9 97.3 97.2 -0.1 97.6 98.0 369875On Target
High needsCPI = 93, Target = 93.3CPI = 93, Target = 93.3 88.5 93.4 93.0 -0.4 93.3 94.3 373275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------24--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 98.5, Target = 98.2CPI = 98.5, Target = 98.2 96.9 98.0 98.5 0.5 98.2 98.5 4482100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.5, Target = 97.3CPI = 92.5, Target = 97.3CPI = 92.5, Target = 97.3 95.4 90.3 92.5 2.2 97.3 97.7 539750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 85.2, Target = 93.5CPI = 85.2, Target = 93.5CPI = 85.2, Target = 93.5 88.9 81.4 85.2 3.8 93.5 94.5 633250Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------24--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92, Target = 98.3CPI = 92, Target = 98.3CPI = 92, Target = 98.3 97.1 91.5 92.0 0.5 98.3 98.6 348150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.5, Target = 92.6CPI = 90.5, Target = 92.6CPI = 90.5, Target = 92.6 87.3 84.5 90.5 6.0 92.6 93.7 419250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 77.8, Target = 82.9CPI = 77.8, Target = 82.9CPI = 77.8, Target = 82.9 70.6 75.0 77.8 2.8 82.9 85.3 252750Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.5, Target = 93.4CPI = 90.5, Target = 93.4CPI = 90.5, Target = 93.4 88.6 85.6 90.5 4.9 93.4 94.3 257950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 36.3 49.09825 2.0 2.0980
High needs 18.4 18.8320 5.3 6.3320
Econ. Disadvantaged--24---24-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--13---13-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 36.8 48.88225 2.3 0.08225
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 40.8 58.89725 4.9 4.19725
High needs 28.2 21.9320 10.3 9.4320
Econ. Disadvantaged--24---24-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--13---13-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 42.0 63.08125 4.5 4.9810
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 12.4 26.19225 3.1 2.29225
High needs 2.9 14.82725 8.6 7.42725
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.9 27.87925 2.4 2.5790
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 45.0 44.0 -1.0 51.0Yes8775On Target
High needsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 45.0 48.0 3.0 51.0No2650Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-20--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-2--
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 45.0 44.0 -1.0 51.0No7450Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 69.0 48.0 -21.0 51.0Yes8775On Target
High needsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 69.0 53.0 -16.0 51.0Yes2775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-2--
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51 71.0 47.5 -23.5 51.0No7450Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 88.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 88.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 88.3, Target = 80 84.8 88.3 3.5 80.0 90.011175On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 81.1, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 81.1, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 81.1, Target = 80 79.1 81.1 2.0 80.0 90.05375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.02--
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.017--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.07--
Asian --- 80.0 90.02--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.02--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.01--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.06--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 90.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 90.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 90.3, Target = 80 87.5 90.3 2.8 80.0 90.09375On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 89.9, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 89.9, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 89.9, Target = 85 87.0 89.9 2.9 85.0 95.09975On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 83.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 83.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 83.7, Target = 85 81.8 83.7 1.9 85.0 95.04325No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.02--
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.017--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.09--
Asian --- 85.0 95.01--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.02--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.04--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.03--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 92.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.5, Target = 85 88.8 92.5 3.7 85.0 95.08075On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 1.4, Target = 0.6 1.1 2.8 1.4 1.4 0.6 0.64243150Improved Below Target
High needsDropout Rate = 2, Target = 1.8 3.1 4.0 2.0 2.0 1.8 1.65014850Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------102--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilities -------72--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------20--
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------24--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteDropout Rate = 1.1, Target = 0.1 0.2 2.3 1.1 1.2 0.1 0.13835450Improved Below Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students225
High needs10
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students9999100Yes999899Yes9999100Yes
High needs3333100Yes3333100Yes3333100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged25---25---25---
EL and Former EL3---3---3---
Students w/ disabilities14---14---14---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.2---2---2---
Asian1---1---1---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---5---
Hispanic/Latino3---3---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---6---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White8282100Yes828199Yes8282100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles