Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Moody Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Moody Elementary
Organization Information
District:Lowell (01600000)School type:Elementary School
School:Moody Elementary (01600027)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 69.4, Target = 84.7CPI = 69.4, Target = 84.7CPI = 69.4, Target = 84.7 73.8 57.9 69.4 11.5 84.7 86.9 89050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 67.4, Target = 84.4CPI = 67.4, Target = 84.4CPI = 67.4, Target = 84.4 73.3 56.3 67.4 11.1 84.4 86.7 177950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 67.2, Target = 59.6CPI = 67.2, Target = 59.6CPI = 67.2, Target = 59.6 55.9 55.9 67.2 11.3 59.6 78.0 1567100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 62.7, Target = 85.1CPI = 62.7, Target = 85.1CPI = 62.7, Target = 85.1 74.4 48.8 62.7 13.9 85.1 87.2 245150Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------13--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino  65.2---- 82.6-29--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 67.3, Target = 85.8CPI = 67.3, Target = 85.8CPI = 67.3, Target = 85.8 75.7 52.3 67.3 15.0 85.8 87.9 34250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.8, Target = 86.6CPI = 80.8, Target = 86.6CPI = 80.8, Target = 86.6 77.0 67.9 80.8 12.9 86.6 88.5 309050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 79.7, Target = 86.1CPI = 79.7, Target = 86.1CPI = 79.7, Target = 86.1 76.2 67.4 79.7 12.3 86.1 88.1 667950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 79.1, Target = 70CPI = 79.1, Target = 70CPI = 79.1, Target = 70 67.3 67.3 79.1 11.8 70.0 83.7 6367100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 75, Target = 84.7CPI = 75, Target = 84.7CPI = 75, Target = 84.7 73.8 61.2 75.0 13.8 84.7 86.9 535150Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------13--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino  72.9---- 86.5-29--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.3, Target = 86.6CPI = 83.3, Target = 86.6CPI = 83.3, Target = 86.6 77.1 60.6 83.3 22.7 86.6 88.6 264250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 1.1 2.29025 30.5 14.49025
High needs 1.1 2.57925 31.8 15.27925
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.4 3.06725 31.9 14.96725
EL and Former EL 1.6 2.05125 39.1 19.65125
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--13---13-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--29---29-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 0.0 4.84225 34.1 19.04225
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 9.1 21.19025 24.2 5.69025
High needs 7.6 21.57925 25.0 6.37925
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.0 22.46725 25.3 6.06725
EL and Former EL 7.2 23.55125 31.9 9.85125
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--13---13-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--29---29-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 6.4 31.04225 31.9 4.84225
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 58.5 52.0 -6.5 51.0Yes5075On Target
High needsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 57.0 49.0 -8.0 51.0Yes4375On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 43.5, Target = 51SGP = 43.5, Target = 51SGP = 43.5, Target = 51 58.0 43.5 -14.5 51.0Yes3875On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-28--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-24--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51 71.0 70.0 -1.0 51.0Yes51100Above Target
High needsSGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51 76.0 69.0 -7.0 51.0Yes44100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51 77.0 70.0 -7.0 51.0Yes39100Above Target
EL and Former ELSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 50.0 68.0 18.0 51.0Yes29100Above Target
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-25--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 47.0 60.0890
High needs 47.0 60.0890
EL and Former EL 47.0 60.0890
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students9797100Yes9797100Yes----
High needs8484100Yes8484100Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged7171100Yes7171100Yes----
EL and Former EL5353100Yes5353100Yes----
Students w/ disabilities12---12-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian14---14-------
Afr. Amer./Black6---6-------
Hispanic/Latino3030100Yes3030100Yes----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White4646100Yes4646100Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles