Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Alexander B Bruce

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Alexander B Bruce

Organization Information

District:

Lawrence (01490000)

School type:

Elementary-Middle School

School:

Alexander B Bruce (01490015)

Grades served:

03,04,05,06,07,08

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		69.5	65.7	71.9	6.2	82.2	84.8	18	466	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		68.3	63.5	69.3	5.8	81.5	84.2	27	404	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		63.9	63.9	70.4	6.5	66.9	82.0	25	356	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		55.6	53.2	63.6	10.4	74.1	77.8	34	184	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		50.3	51.8	52.1	0.3	71.0	75.2	21	94	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		68.0	64.5	71.6	7.1	81.3	84.0	28	430	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		54.5	65.2	68.9	3.7	73.5	77.3	30	465	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		53.6	63.0	66.6	3.6	72.9	76.8	44	403	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		63.6	63.6	66.8	3.2	66.6	81.8	44	355	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		44.9	59.1	64.1	5.0	67.9	72.5	49	184	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		36.2	44.1	48.9	4.8	62.8	68.1	33	94	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		52.8	64.2	69.1	4.9	72.5	76.4	51	429	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		49.5	52.1	44.4	-7.7	70.5	74.8	9	171	0	Declined
High needs		47.8	49.3	42.3	-7.0	69.6	73.9	11	149	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		50.4	50.4	42.6	-7.8	54.5	75.2	17	129	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		33.9	35.2	35.3	0.1	61.4	67.0	16	63	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		35.3	37.8	33.0	-4.8	62.3	67.7	16	44	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		47.5	50.0	44.0	-6.0	69.4	73.8	17	155	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	4.0	2.8	466	0	23.6	17.2	466	25
High needs	2.7	2.0	404	0	26.1	19.1	404	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.0	2.2	356	0	25.8	17.7	356	25
EL and Former EL	1.3	0.0	184	0	40.9	25.0	184	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	94	0	41.8	31.9	94	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Hispanic/Latino	4.0	2.8	430	0	24.9	17.7	430	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	13.4	14.4	465	0	28.9	25.4	465	25
High needs	11.0	12.2	403	25	32.0	28.0	403	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	11.1	12.1	355	0	31.9	27.9	355	25
EL and Former EL	8.7	9.8	184	25	35.6	31.5	184	25
Students w/ disabilities	3.1	0.0	94	0	54.6	47.9	94	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Hispanic/Latino	12.1	14.5	429	25	30.1	24.9	429	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.7	1.2	171	25	43.1	51.5	171	0
High needs	0.7	0.7	149	0	47.8	55.7	149	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.8	0.8	129	0	47.5	55.8	129	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	63	0	65.6	68.3	63	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	44	0	66.7	72.7	44	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.7	0.6	155	0	46.5	52.9	155	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		45.0	47.0	2.0	51.0	Yes	371	75	On Target
High needs		44.0	47.0	3.0	51.0	Yes	317	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		46.5	47.5	1.0	51.0	Yes	282	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		40.0	49.0	9.0	51.0	Yes	123	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		43.0	45.0	2.0	51.0	No	83	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		45.0	47.0	2.0	51.0	Yes	344	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		43.0	52.0	9.0	51.0	No	374	75	On Target
High needs		43.0	50.0	7.0	51.0	No	320	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		43.0	50.0	7.0	51.0	No	285	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		37.0	47.0	10.0	51.0	Yes	125	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		46.0	49.0	3.0	51.0	No	83	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		43.0	52.0	9.0	51.0	Yes	345	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	70.0	60.0	125.00	25
High needs	70.0	60.0	125.00	25
EL and Former EL	70.0	60.0	125.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	533	530	99	Yes	533	529	99	Yes	202	201	100	Yes
High needs	467	464	99	Yes	467	463	99	Yes	179	178	99	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	404	401	99	Yes	404	400	99	Yes	153	152	99	Yes
EL and Former EL	228	228	100	Yes	228	228	100	Yes	85	85	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	106	105	99	Yes	106	105	99	Yes	50	50	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	493	491	100	Yes	493	490	99	Yes	186	185	99	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	22	-	-	-	22	-	-	-	11	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.