Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Memorial
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Memorial
Organization Information
District:Hopedale (01380000)School type:Elementary School
School:Memorial (01380010)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:CentralTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.5, Target = 94.5CPI = 91.5, Target = 94.5CPI = 91.5, Target = 94.5 90.6 92.5 91.5 -1.0 94.5 95.3 7734825No Change
High needsCPI = 78.3, Target = 86.1CPI = 78.3, Target = 86.1CPI = 78.3, Target = 86.1 76.2 77.9 78.3 0.4 86.1 88.1 639250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80.1, Target = 84.5CPI = 80.1, Target = 84.5CPI = 80.1, Target = 84.5 83.1 83.1 80.1 -3.0 84.5 91.6 67340Declined
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 74.3, Target = 82.4CPI = 74.3, Target = 82.4CPI = 74.3, Target = 82.4 69.9 73.2 74.3 1.1 82.4 85.0 766850Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 91.2, Target = 94.5CPI = 91.2, Target = 94.5CPI = 91.2, Target = 94.5 90.5 92.4 91.2 -1.2 94.5 95.3 6830825No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.5, Target = 93.9CPI = 89.5, Target = 93.9CPI = 89.5, Target = 93.9 89.6 88.7 89.5 0.8 93.9 94.8 6834450Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 72.7, Target = 84.8CPI = 72.7, Target = 84.8CPI = 72.7, Target = 84.8 74.0 71.8 72.7 0.9 84.8 87.0 358850Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.1, Target = 76.5CPI = 78.1, Target = 76.5CPI = 78.1, Target = 76.5 74.4 74.4 78.1 3.7 76.5 87.2 5732100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 66.9, Target = 79.8CPI = 66.9, Target = 79.8CPI = 66.9, Target = 79.8 65.3 65.9 66.9 1.0 79.8 82.7 576550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 89.8, Target = 94.1CPI = 89.8, Target = 94.1CPI = 89.8, Target = 94.1 89.8 88.2 89.8 1.6 94.1 94.9 6130450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.7, Target = 92.1CPI = 89.7, Target = 92.1CPI = 89.7, Target = 92.1 86.5 88.4 89.7 1.3 92.1 93.3 828775On Target
High needsCPI = 76, Target = 83.7CPI = 76, Target = 83.7CPI = 76, Target = 83.7 72.0 73.3 76.0 2.7 83.7 86.0 762450Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------7--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 90.6, Target = 92.1CPI = 90.6, Target = 92.1CPI = 90.6, Target = 92.1 86.4 87.4 90.6 3.2 92.1 93.2 797275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 24.8 22.73480 3.0 2.634825
High needs 5.3 3.3920 11.6 9.89225
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.6 5.9340 11.6 8.83425
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 1.56825 14.5 11.86825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 23.7 21.83080 3.1 2.630825
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 35.0 39.534425 5.2 5.83440
High needs 10.5 15.98825 14.7 20.5880
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.6 25.03225 14.0 15.6320
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 7.2 4.6650 18.8 24.6650
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 32.9 37.230425 5.2 4.93040
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 28.9 32.28725 5.2 1.18725
High needs 6.9 4.2240 17.2 4.22425
Econ. Disadvantaged--7---7-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 26.4 29.27225 5.7 0.07225
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 59.5, Target = 51SGP = 59.5, Target = 51SGP = 59.5, Target = 51 61.5 59.5 -2.0 51.0No26275On Target
High needsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 57.0 54.0 -3.0 51.0No6375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 43.0 51.0 8.0 51.0No4775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-10--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 59.5, Target = 51SGP = 59.5, Target = 51SGP = 59.5, Target = 51 60.0 59.5 -0.5 51.0No23275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 58.0 64.0 6.0 51.0No259100Above Target
High needsSGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51 54.5 69.0 14.5 51.0No59100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 41.5 68.0 26.5 51.0No44100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-10--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 56.0 64.0 8.0 51.0No229100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.010-
High needs- 60.010-
EL and Former EL- 60.010-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students355354100Yes35535099Yes898798Yes
High needs949399Yes948995Yes262496Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged3535100Yes353397Yes7---
EL and Former EL11---11---5---
Students w/ disabilities696899Yes696597Yes19---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian10---10---7---
Afr. Amer./Black4---4-------
Hispanic/Latino19---19---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.2---2---1---
White313312100Yes31330898Yes747297Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles